Some Consumers Willing To Pay For Online News
A new report suggests some consumers may be willing to pay for online news content. J.D. Power and Associates has released a…
network
A new report suggests some consumers may be willing to pay for online news content. J.D. Power and Associates has released a…
Recently Webproworld readers fired off a couple hundred comments regarding the US House of Representatives’ definition of journalist in the Free Flow of Information Act, a law shielding journalists from having to reveal their sources. A new development in Virginia involving a citizen journalist shows why this definition needs to be broadened to include bloggers, and any other type of journalist.
There are a few interesting Facebook-related stories out there at the moment. The first comes from Inside Facebook, where Justin Smith asks "What do I do if someone has already created a Facebook Page for my brand?"
Fair use is back in the news courtesy of a New York Times article on publishers being unhappy with the use of excerpts of their content. The main focal point of the article is Henry Blodget of Silicon Alley Insider, who recently quoted a WSJ columnist.
Google Docs users may recall last month when Google improved the mobile version by adding list view for spreadsheets, which allows you to view, edit, sort, and filter them. Before that you could only view them. Google has now made the same list view available for working on spreadsheets from desktop and notebook computers. It can be found in the View menu.
Two versions of a bill in Congress would enshrine a journalist’s right to keep his or her sources confidential, effectively banning the government from forcing journalists to reveal whistleblowers. One version though—the House version—gives an incredibly stupid definition of journalist that excludes not only bloggers, but freelancers, independents, and nonprofit journalists as well. For the most part, the Senate and House agree on what a…