Serj...
Both of your sites are in the Yahoo! index...
http://search.yahoo.com/search?ei=UT...info-diet.com+
http://search.yahoo.com/search?ei=UT...hoodiashop.com
They just aren't found for the terms you're targeting, likely for the above reasons. Or, more likely because your software doesn't provide instant
SEO as it claims. No software provides instant
SEO, it requires a good deal of research, much study, a considerable degree of knowledge of the subject, and application of said knowledge. To suggest a web design software can instantly
SEO your site, and guarantee results is quite simply ludicrous. It wreaks of the same essence as the hoodia and male enhancement products, and quite likely the diet pills on the site that doesn't work, that isn't banned as well.
I don't know, but for some reason your product line looks all to much like the list of goodies in my e-mail Spam filter folder to say Yahoo! probably wasn't justified in assessing the penalties that result in your sites not being found.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mishj
I am fed up with the disinformation on this site! Yahoo! does NOT ban sites! I have replied to many of the postings on webproworld whereby a user has claimed that yahoo has banned them, only to find that actually the site has not been banned - this leads me to wonder who is behind webproworld? I think this forum should be renamed GoogleAmateurWorld
|
Mishj, you need to seek a Yahoo! support forum someplace to preach these allegations. I'm no more a fan of Google than anyone else, I deplore their tactics of suppressing results on the basis of age/experience, because in doing so they support misinformation and do NOT provide the most relevant results for data currently available.
However, your repeated allegations that WPW expresses bias in this matter, and should be named GoogleAmateurWorld here tonight, are unfounded. They are totally out of place, uncalled for, and to say the least off topic here. This thread isn't about Google or it's comparative value as a search engine in relation to Yahoo!, nor does it have anything to do with "WPW's" postion on search engines; it's about Yahoo! dropping Serj's results for what appears to be a penalty in search results.
Furthermore your suggestion in
thread here that the only way to attain top listing in Google results is to pay for them is quite frankly bulls.hit, I have attained top listings in Google results for numerous search strings on more than one topic, on several sites, as have numerous others here at WPW, without paying a dime, and your suggestion that WPW offers a biased opinion serves only to prove that you lack the experience to offer informed input on the topic of
SEO. Personally, I don't care who you know at Yahoo!, if you can't get results on Google without paying for them, you aren't doing it right!!!