iEntry 10th Anniversary Forum Rules Search
WebProWorld
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read
WebProWorld: Guidelines/Announcements/Suggestions Policy posts and questions as well as Forum news and updates. Also the thread for posting your questions and comments.

Share Thread: & Tags

Share Thread:

View Poll Results: Should we keep the rep system?
Yes! 11 39.29%
No! 10 35.71%
I Don't Care Either Way 7 25.00%
Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2009, 01:14 AM
williamc's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: GoogleVille
Posts: 1,585
williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Wow, who would have thought that when confronted with facts yet again, and not having a reply that will stand up, he tries changing the subject real quick?
__________________
William Cross
Expert Search Engine Optimization
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2009, 01:29 AM
crankydave's Avatar
Moderator
WebProWorld Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Playing with fire!
Posts: 4,243
crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Quote:
Originally Posted by deepsand View Post
Which merely evades the question. No matter.

Now, you have repeatedly stated that, with regard to anonymous rep., there was no way for any member to be certain as to its source, that they can do no more than speculate. Assuming that that is the case, then how is it that multiple members should so quickly come to act in concert? Mere coincidence, or an informed source?

BTW, the behavior under discussion began MAY, when a certain member entered the thread relevant outbound link WITHOUT inbound link , not in FEB.
I evaded nothing.

The facts I stated are verifiable.

As so far as a member being certain, I told you the same thing but you had made up your mind as to "certain". Told you your "guesses" were wrong. You told me...

Quote:
As for "guessing," real time observations are not guesses.
Yes, I still have that PM too.

The repeated inferences from you and kgun that I have been some sort of an "informed source" are simply not true.

You and he can definitively figure things out but noone else can unless it's because I'm "informing" them. So I get repeatedly accused and insulted.

If I'm guilty of anything, it was trying to tell you, you were wrong with your "guessing".

Dave
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2009, 01:33 AM
williamc's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: GoogleVille
Posts: 1,585
williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Well, I am just happy Kjell should finally 'definitively' figure out he has been had.
__________________
William Cross
Expert Search Engine Optimization
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2009, 01:37 AM
deepsand's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,226
deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Quote:
Originally Posted by You Know Who
Another kitten bites the dust!!
Assumes facts not in evidence.
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2009, 01:39 AM
deepsand's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,226
deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Quote:
Originally Posted by williamc View Post
Well, I am just happy Kjell should finally 'definitively' figure out he has been had.
Which explains his being likewise attacked how?
  #56 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2009, 01:52 AM
deepsand's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,226
deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Quote:
Originally Posted by crankydave View Post
If I'm guilty of anything, it was trying to tell you, you were wrong with your "guessing".
1) At Time = T, Member X views Discussion D; at Time = T+1, with no other Member viewing Discussion D, red rep. is received. Is that a "guess?"

2) At Time = T, red rep. with Points = P received; at same Time, only 1 Member with Rep. Level RL such that P < RL+1 and P > RL-1. Just another "guess?"

Had you chosen to, you could have put stop to this quite some time ago. What did you hope to gain by allowing it to continue?
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2009, 01:56 AM
kgun's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Norway
Posts: 5,684
kgun RepRank 9kgun RepRank 9kgun RepRank 9kgun RepRank 9kgun RepRank 9kgun RepRank 9kgun RepRank 9kgun RepRank 9kgun RepRank 9kgun RepRank 9kgun RepRank 9
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

We are on

The World's Forum for eBusiness Professionals.

Personally, I have noted who defends
  1. a system that is very biased (nonobjective)
  2. can be very easily manipulated.
It is still some green / red pixels.

I have also noted that some that discredit Google's green pixels, (ToolBar Rank and call it FoolBar Rank) that are more objective support this. In that respect this forum's moderator, ctabuk is more consistent. He don't support any of the tools.

I would definitely go to another place to look for a SEO specialist.

Enjoy the pixel game. This should have been written in another thread and not in the poll. I log out.

Last edited by kgun; 07-30-2009 at 02:04 AM. Reason: Spelling error.
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2009, 02:18 AM
deepsand's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,226
deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Quote:
Originally Posted by crankydave View Post
The repeated inferences from you and kgun that I have been some sort of an "informed source" are simply not true.

You and he can definitively figure things out but noone else can unless it's because I'm "informing" them. So I get repeatedly accused and insulted.
If you were wrongly suspected it was not for lack of the appearance of reason.

1) Excluding Tubby, who only lately joined the Group, and merely observed, of the members of the Red Rep Raiders, all but one have identities that were deduced with relative ease.

2) All such members were long ago identified as being closely associated with you.

3) It was long ago observed, in discussions in which you participate, that you have a tendency to give more forebearance with respect to their behavior to those participants with whom you agree.

4) You took a public stance supportive of the behavior of said Group Members.

5) You red repped me for a post that mentioned you in what was then intended to portray you in a positive light.

Given the above, it is only natural that the light of suspicion should fall on you. In my case, such did not come either quickly or easily; mightly and long did I wrestle with my doubts before reaching a conclusion that I found most distasteful.

If it be the case that you have been wronged by me, then I most sincerely apologize.
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2009, 02:23 AM
crankydave's Avatar
Moderator
WebProWorld Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Playing with fire!
Posts: 4,243
crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Quote:
Originally Posted by deepsand View Post
1) At Time = T, Member X views Discussion D; at Time = T+1, with no other Member viewing Discussion D, red rep. is received. Is that a "guess?"

2) At Time = T, red rep. with Points = P received; at same Time, only 1 Member with Rep. Level RL such that P < RL+1 and P > RL-1. Just another "guess?"

Had you chosen to, you could have put stop to this quite some time ago. What did you hope to gain by allowing it to continue?

Me? Allowing "it" to continue?

Should I have just flat assed banned you for violating the TOS via the rep system when you did? Afterall, according to you that's exactly what you did.

No deepsand, wasn't a matter of me "allowing" anything.

Dave
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2009, 02:34 AM
deepsand's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,226
deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

For the moment, I shall assume that you've not yet read my previous post, and withhold further comment.
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2009, 02:48 AM
crankydave's Avatar
Moderator
WebProWorld Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Playing with fire!
Posts: 4,243
crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Quote:
Originally Posted by deepsand View Post
If you were wrongly suspected it was not for lack of the appearance of reason.

1) Excluding Tubby, who only lately joined the Group, and merely observed, of the members of the Red Rep Raiders, all but one have identities that were deduced with relative ease.

2) All such members were long ago identified as being closely associated with you.

3) It was long ago observed, in discussions in which you participate, that you have a tendency to give more forebearance with respect to their behavior to those participants with whom you agree.

4) You took a public stance supportive of the behavior of said Group Members.

5) You red repped me for a post that mentioned you in what was then intended to portray you in a positive light.

Given the above, it is only natural that the light of suspicion should fall on you. In my case, such did not come either quickly or easily; mightly and long did I wrestle with my doubts before reaching a conclusion that I found most distasteful.

If it be the case that you have been wronged by me, then I most sincerely apologize.
deepsand... they only red rep you ever received from me was in direct response to red you had given me for no good reason whatsoever. Prior to that, you had rec'd nothing but green and you know it.

I will tell you this about what you call "said Group Members"... each and every one of them know me. Each and every one of them know I would not hesitate to drop the ban hammer on them if they spit in my face when it comes to me moderating this forum.
Each and everyone of them know that I do not nor will I share information I am privy to as a mod that the general membership is not privy to.

As far as the social group I created goes... I created it for EXACTLY the purpose I said I created for. Anyone can join and read anything posted. It was for the SOLE purpose of keeping BS off the boards that I didn't (and don't) want on the boards.

It was allow a place for those who had "issues" with the rep system to discuss/debate/ hash it out. You can join it yourself and see if my opinions are any different there than what I have posted on the boards.

I remain steadfast in my belief that it has no place nor purpose on the boards.... period.

I have not voted in this poll. Put if push came to shove I would vote yes because removing the system would not remove the underlying "issues" causing all this nonsense to begin with.

I need to get some sleep... I have a company to run

And most graciously accepted deepsand.

Dave
  #62 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2009, 02:56 AM
deepsand's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,226
deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Quote:
Originally Posted by crankydave View Post
Should I have just flat assed banned you for violating the TOS via the rep system when you did? Afterall, according to you that's exactly what you did.
Were it the case that you accepted such as being a violation of the ToS, as I posited, and you felt that I too had commited such violation, then you should have given everyone involved, including me, the requisite warnings.
  #63 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2009, 03:00 AM
williamc's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: GoogleVille
Posts: 1,585
williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Kgun: Exactly when did either WPW's rep system, OR the Google Foolbar become ranking factors in any search engine? That is, after all, the ONLY things SEO is actually concerned with. Come now Kjell, insults tossed out with childish reasoning are only insults and not generally taken notice of. Once again, I would have thought prior that this was beneath your stated intellectual level. Appears I was mistaken.

In regards to deepsouted, I do not presume to speak for CrankyDave, especially as he already did reply, but a couple of deepsands 'points' are elementary to surmise and break down into what they really are, not what deepsand would like to manipulate them into being.

1) If by 'group' you mean the red rep rangers social group which was started by CrankyDave as a place for YOU and Kgun to rant and whine over the rep war YOU started instead of it being all over the boards in hijacked threads where it had no reason to be other than your own agenda of confusion, then only the 'missing' people in the group actually shows something. That something being that the 'missing' people, the ones who 'said' they wanted to discuss the issue, merely wanted to cause dissent and hijack other peoples public threads and NOT discuss rep issues in a unbiased setting especially designed for that purpose. Tubby, like the rest of us, joined to see what comes of it all next. It is a public social group that requires NO approval. Simply click the 'join group' links and presto, you are in. No bias, no bull. Which I suspect now is why you refused to use it. No great surprise.

2) I would not know, I seem to have lost my magic 8-ball that tells me what 'members' your manipulations have spread to people are the illuminati against you.

3) I would love to see you try to back that claim up. I honestly would. I myself have been told I would be banned by CrankyDave if I did not slow my roll a couple times. I am just not quite as dumb as kgun was tp keep going and test Daves patience. Kgun apparently was not that smart.

4) Being that your biggest issue was rep pixels, I will presume (or observe as you like to call it) that this is in regards to Dave stating that rep could be given out for any reason anyone wants to give it, be it green, or red? That is just common sense, not supporting someone. That surely does appear to apply to anyone/everyone to me. Heck, it may even be forum policy, but that ones not in my 'inside information' handbook.

5) No clue, as my magic 8-ball doesn't tell me what Dave has done or not done either.

Well damn, 4 out of 5 seem like common sense. That is surprising from someone who toots his horn as an intellectual, I must say. That you feel these things which are so easily broken down and shown in their real light are somehow evidenciary or documentative of some foul play in progress.

CrankyDave must really be some foul sinister mastermind out to trick us all, oh wait, you were already outed for that in this thread in a way that is verifiable by admins, my bad.

Quote:
Originally Posted by deepsand View Post
Were it the case that you accepted such as being a violation of the ToS, as I posited, and you felt that I too had commited such violation, then you should have given everyone involved, including me, the requisite warnings.

It would seem to be more common sense is needed on deepsands part here. I would think (or It is my Opinion) that Dave obviously did NOT feel it was a ToS violation or he WOULD have said something. Obviously, none of the other moderators or admins in that thread felt it was either or THEY would have said something, or done something. Once again, you are spitting in the wind attempting to confuse things.
__________________
William Cross
Expert Search Engine Optimization

Last edited by williamc; 07-30-2009 at 03:20 AM. Reason: added new quote and reply
  #64 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2009, 03:21 AM
Moderator
WebProWorld Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 878
weegillis RepRank 6weegillis RepRank 6weegillis RepRank 6weegillis RepRank 6weegillis RepRank 6weegillis RepRank 6weegillis RepRank 6
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

William: Chill, Man.
The Rest of You: CHILL, Man.

Solution: STOP giving rep points to Veteran or above. Grade, or Rep the new members who have jumped on board in interesting threads and left a good bit more than two cents worth.
  #65 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2009, 03:27 AM
williamc's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: GoogleVille
Posts: 1,585
williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Wee: That is your system and while I feel you have the full right to do things the way you see it as fair, Other members also have the exact same right.

As far as chilling out, you must be kidding me. I am ecstatic right now. This thread has culminated in verifiably proving something I have observed for quite some time, and some other things I have presumed as well. I have even mentioned to a user here that intelligence is not always inherent in good people only. I have even pointed out to said user that he was being 'led' around by intellectual manipulations.

So chill? I am so cool baby it 'aint' funny
__________________
William Cross
Expert Search Engine Optimization
  #66 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2009, 03:31 AM
WebProWorld Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ibiza
Posts: 386
kevsta RepRank 2kevsta RepRank 2
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

I wish i could care about "rep" points, I really do. it would obviously mean I had no other problems worth mentioning in my life
  #67 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2009, 03:34 AM
williamc's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: GoogleVille
Posts: 1,585
williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

kevsta: or that your entire life hinged on a message board. that is the truly sad option.
__________________
William Cross
Expert Search Engine Optimization
  #68 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2009, 03:43 AM
WebProWorld Pro
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 147
angilina RepRank 8angilina RepRank 8angilina RepRank 8angilina RepRank 8angilina RepRank 8angilina RepRank 8angilina RepRank 8angilina RepRank 8angilina RepRank 8
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Quote:
Originally Posted by rah View Post
Ok, since our rep system has been such a huge issue for some of our members, I'm putting it up for a vote as to whether or not we keep the system or disable it for everyone.

Here's your chance to either save it, or banish it to the eternal darkness of our servers.

This poll will remain open until 12:00 pm (EST) Friday July 31 2009.
I have got many negative Reps and I have no idea what I did wrong. I am an active member at digital point, sitepoint, NP, V7N and I have all green reps. At DP, I have 8 or so green bars with 7500 posts.

But at this forum, I have got many red reps and I have no idea why.

I personally think that there is some serious issue with the current rep system. May be admins should moderate reps to see if reps are given correctly or not.

I vote for NO and hope to see the current rep system changed.
__________________
Learn How You Can Earn Money Online Without Investing Any Money From Your Own Pocket Ever. Do Free Online Jobs and Make Money Online Without Worrying About Any Scams.
  #69 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2009, 05:05 AM
Moderator
WebProWorld Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 878
weegillis RepRank 6weegillis RepRank 6weegillis RepRank 6weegillis RepRank 6weegillis RepRank 6weegillis RepRank 6weegillis RepRank 6
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Let the member unhinge themselves with their off color posts but maintain a steady accrual of good reps. That would give people something to gauge another member by when they stumble on a skewed post--they can see that the member must have lots of valued posts, as well, to outweigh the current diversion.

Last edited by weegillis; 07-30-2009 at 05:08 AM.
  #70 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2009, 05:10 AM
williamc's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: GoogleVille
Posts: 1,585
williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

angilina: I can't say for sure off the top of my head, but but I suspect it may have something to do with these sorts of posts:

Quote:
Originally Posted by angilina View Post
Google is updating the visible PR very fast these days. After every few days, there is a visible PR update.
Quote:
Originally Posted by angilina View Post
If you are interested in link exchanges then you should only do link exchanges with sites that are related to your Niche. Only then can you expect to get some benefit from such links.
Quote:
Originally Posted by angilina View Post
Backlinks from PR 0 pages worth very less than a backlink that is coming from a trust worthy PR5 site.
Bolding: Mine.

There are a whole lot more posts you have made with incorrect information that you post as factual.

I know if I ran across them, one of 2 things would happen: 1) I would call you on it in the thread and maybe give red rep, or 2) if someone else had already corrected it in the thread, you might get red from me.

My position on my own way of giving rep has been given several times: If you post inaccurate or misleading info as fact, or it is downright stupid, expect red.
__________________
William Cross
Expert Search Engine Optimization

Last edited by williamc; 07-30-2009 at 05:18 AM.
  #71 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2009, 05:53 AM
WebProWorld Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bellville
Posts: 56
Modified RepRank 2
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Well, it's much more difficult for a new member that doesn't have much rep to start with. Sure there are lots of new members that just post crap and deserve red, but when you get red because someone disagrees with you then it sucks, like when some idiot gave me red because they think msn is a search engine. And then they give it anonymously so you can't even all them an idiot.

Maybe it's got something to do with the need to give 20 reps before you can rep the same person again, or maybe it's because you got red so you must give others red, but the impression I'm beginning to get is that this is not a place to discuss things and that my input is not wanted and definitely not appreciated.

I've voted for I Don't Care Either Way because right now, I don't care much for this forum and probably won't be back so to me it doesn't matter either way. I've met some nice, clever people here but the few ***** put me off.

See you guys around sometime.
  #72 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2009, 06:24 AM
Tubby's Avatar
Moderator
WebProWorld Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kajabbi N.W Queensland - (Outback)
Posts: 1,806
Tubby RepRank 9Tubby RepRank 9Tubby RepRank 9Tubby RepRank 9Tubby RepRank 9Tubby RepRank 9Tubby RepRank 9Tubby RepRank 9Tubby RepRank 9Tubby RepRank 9Tubby RepRank 9
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

modified said
"my input is not wanted and definitely not appreciated."

not appreciated by everybody. Maybe. . . Sometimes our critics can seem somewhat louder than a silent majority.

I love you Modified (well just a little bit)

.
__________________
classic cars - directory - todays adverts
If Optimising for google gives you a headache? - try optimising your Users
  #73 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2009, 10:18 AM
williamc's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: GoogleVille
Posts: 1,585
williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tubby View Post
Sometimes our critics can seem somewhat louder than a silent majority.
Amen brutha! This poll & thread even being here is a perfect example of that.
__________________
William Cross
Expert Search Engine Optimization
  #74 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2009, 10:37 AM
janeth's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colombia S.A
Posts: 5,709
janeth RepRank 7janeth RepRank 7janeth RepRank 7janeth RepRank 7janeth RepRank 7janeth RepRank 7janeth RepRank 7janeth RepRank 7
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Quote:
Originally Posted by deepsand View Post
What has that to do with 4 or 5 members colluding to engage in a continuous red attack against myself or any other?
I had nothing to do with your little game until one day I looked and saw a lot of reds from one person that only left a . or a * for the comments.

Then I read someone post about how you leave your red with a little . or * sign.

I wanted to return the red you'd been giving me and did so. Maybe all the people giving you red is because you try to run around and given them red.
  #75 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2009, 10:48 AM
janeth's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colombia S.A
Posts: 5,709
janeth RepRank 7janeth RepRank 7janeth RepRank 7janeth RepRank 7janeth RepRank 7janeth RepRank 7janeth RepRank 7janeth RepRank 7
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Quote:
Originally Posted by angilina View Post
Because at DP, you will see a new thread that will say "My PR changed"

I asked a question in Google groups
Don't believe anything you read on the internet, or, for that matter, anything you hear, unless it is consistent with what you already know to be true, or unless you have taken the time to research the matter to prove its accuracy to your satisfaction. This is known as "doing your homework."
  #76 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2009, 03:23 PM
chrisJumbo's Avatar
WebProWorld Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: California
Posts: 339
chrisJumbo RepRank 3chrisJumbo RepRank 3
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Frankly, I look more at the number of posts than someone's Rep. I think the only Red Rep I've given were to people who seemed to be spammers by me and others in the post.

I've given some green's out. I think I even gave a green to someone who got a Red when it seemed to be a personal attack.

If you are going to keep it, make it so it can't be annoymous. You have to stand by your Red (or Green). Also, I don't think someone should be able to give Green (or Red) and have it count more than others.

Maybe adding a system where you have to have a certain number of posts (10 or 20) before leaving Rep would be good. Maybe you already do.

On one hand, I'm shocked by all of the immaturity On the other hand I've coached youth sports for too long to be surprised by how immature adults can be. :O)

Let's try to remember why this forum exists and why we volunteer our time to help others trying to learn.

I vote yes, but with changes.
__________________
CD Rates | CD Rates Blog | Banking Online

Last edited by chrisJumbo; 07-30-2009 at 03:25 PM. Reason: Wanted to add clarification to my vote.
  #77 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2009, 07:46 PM
crankydave's Avatar
Moderator
WebProWorld Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Playing with fire!
Posts: 4,243
crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9crankydave RepRank 9
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

missing posts have been moved to their own thread...

How Often Does TBPR Update?

Dave

Last edited by crankydave; 07-30-2009 at 07:51 PM.
  #78 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2009, 01:28 AM
Mel Mel is offline
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,903
Mel RepRank 2Mel RepRank 2
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

IMO it is a system which is clearly open to abuse, but it does serve some purposes so I vote YES
__________________
Mel Nelson
Expert SEO | Cheap used cars
  #79 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2009, 01:55 AM
deepsand's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,226
deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

In response to my post at WebProWorld Rep System
Quote:
Originally Posted by A Red Rep Raider
he obviously did not accept anything as such. assumes facts not in evidence.
Carefully re-read Dave's question. It was a hypothetical based on facts in evidence, one that was worthy of a forthright and honest answer.

I did assert that certain use of the rep. system constituted a violation of the ToS; Dave did assert that he viewed my own use as falling within the same scope. Those are facts in plain public view.

Dave's question was quite simple and easily understood; i.e., if he accepted my assertion, and if he allowed of his own, then what?.

To have ignored such would have simply brought forth from you a different criticism.

In so damning the answer you have damned the question and likewise the questioner.

You have here simply evidenced yourself to not be given to critical thinking in all regards.

Last edited by deepsand; 08-01-2009 at 02:19 AM.
  #80 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2009, 11:59 AM
williamc's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: GoogleVille
Posts: 1,585
williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Quote:
Should I have just flat assed banned you for violating the TOS via the rep system when you did? Afterall, according to you that's exactly what you did.
You apparently are not a critical thinker. The second part of that line is a quantifier, or as some would call it, a qualifier. It explains that part of Daves first sentence, as being 'what you called it'. Not what he actually thinks or does not think.

Please try harder than this to make an intellectual post.

And sorry, just noticed you apparently quoted a rep comment, not a thread post. For someone who whined so hard to get rid of the rep system you sure do love quoting comments you get a lot. Seems to be an ego thing. Might want to seek help for that

CrankyDave: Please do correct me if I am incorrect in what I said
__________________
William Cross
Expert Search Engine Optimization
  #81 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2009, 12:49 PM
deepsand's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,226
deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

You need to learn to differentiate between whining and substantive rebuttal.

Dave asked a legitimate question, and I gave it the answer it deserved.

It is not for you or any other to judge either.
  #82 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2009, 12:54 PM
williamc's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: GoogleVille
Posts: 1,585
williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Quote:
Originally Posted by deepsand View Post
You need to learn to differentiate between whining and substantive rebuttal.

Dave asked a legitimate question, and I gave it the answer it deserved.

It is not for you or any other to judge either.
Assumes facts not yet in evidence until this post.

I clearly stated: "CrankyDave: Please do correct me if I am incorrect in what I said "

Dave was last seen reading in this thread at a time AFTER I posted the above. I surely do not see him as correcting me, do you?

Once again, ignorance may be bliss until you open your mouth and I then remove all doubt.

Sorry to burst your bubble kiddo.
__________________
William Cross
Expert Search Engine Optimization
  #83 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2009, 06:04 PM
deepsand's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,226
deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Nor have we seen him correcting me, junior.
  #84 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2009, 07:05 PM
williamc's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: GoogleVille
Posts: 1,585
williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Why would he have a need to? It's already been done.
__________________
William Cross
Expert Search Engine Optimization
  #85 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2009, 08:35 PM
deepsand's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,226
deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

You've no standing in the matter.
  #86 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2009, 09:16 PM
williamc's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: GoogleVille
Posts: 1,585
williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Actually, I spoke to Dave directly after posting to make absolutely sure I was not mistaken about his meaning

Sorry D, once again, you...

__________________
William Cross
Expert Search Engine Optimization

Last edited by williamc; 08-01-2009 at 09:22 PM.
  #87 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2009, 09:23 PM
AVC AVC is offline
WebProWorld Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 468
AVC RepRank 1
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

This forum sucks because of the Phil Craven Gang who has been allowed to ruin the joint.

They are continuing the destruction they have worked for years here and it has become a rotten stinking place because management has allowed it when they have known about it for over a year now.

webworkshop.net/seoforum/index.php

Moderators
PhilC: Google's custom search engines • Mel: Expert SEO • WilliamC: Search Engine Optimization • Janeth: geeksonsteroids.com• Nicky_uk: Search Engine Marketing Services • Feydakin: Animal Jewelry • CrankyDave: Religious Jewelry •

Last edited by AVC; 08-01-2009 at 09:32 PM.
  #88 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2009, 09:27 PM
deepsand's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,226
deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Quote:
Originally Posted by williamc View Post
Actually, I spoke to Dave directly after posting to make absolutely sure I was not mistaken about his meaningPhil Craven Gang
So you claim.

Last edited by deepsand; 08-01-2009 at 09:30 PM.
  #89 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2009, 09:28 PM
williamc's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: GoogleVille
Posts: 1,585
williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Quote:
Originally Posted by deepsand View Post
So you claim.
Yes, I would claim I spoke to a moderator when I did in fact not do so, just so the mod could ban me for whatever period. Again, you show your true intellect.
__________________
William Cross
Expert Search Engine Optimization
  #90 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2009, 09:43 PM
deepsand's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,226
deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

So, now you're claiming to be Dave's authorized agent?

Before you speak again, consider the implications of the underlying tenet of the principal/agent relationship - the acts and knowledge of the agent are deemed to be the acts and knowledge of the principal!

The principal becomes responsible for the errors, of both commission and omission, of his agent.

And, what type of agency have we here? One of designation, ratification or estoppel? Well, since Dave has not publicly stated that he has designated you as his agent, we can rule out the first. I leave it to you to decide between the others.
  #91 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2009, 09:52 PM
williamc's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: GoogleVille
Posts: 1,585
williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Hmm which part of "Actually, I spoke to Dave directly after posting to make absolutely sure I was not mistaken about his meaning" did you fail to understand?

I asked Dave if my understanding of what he said was correct. He said Yes.

That does not imply any agent relationship. that means I spoke to him and asked a question, which I repeated here.

The navy sure seems to have wasted money in this case

The fact remains: Everything you have said about this is incorrect as per the norm, so all is well
__________________
William Cross
Expert Search Engine Optimization
  #92 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2009, 09:54 PM
AVC AVC is offline
WebProWorld Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 468
AVC RepRank 1
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Yeah, we know you are a member of the CrankyDave arse kissing club along with Janeth and a few others around here William !!!


Duh, I wonder who is abusing the reputation system William ??

Could it be the same thing you and Phil did to me on SEW moron ???
  #93 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2009, 10:00 PM
williamc's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: GoogleVille
Posts: 1,585
williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Quote:
Originally Posted by AVC View Post
Duh, I wonder who is abusing the reputation system William ??
AVC: The person who began abusing the rep system was already outed and proven in an admin verifiable means. The fact you bring it up again probably only causes him distress to have it in the eyes of everyone yet again afte rall his attempts to bury it in cloudiness, so does it bother me? Not in the least. It inspired me

As for rep, I have stated many times the reasons I give bad rep, one being stupid comments.
__________________
William Cross
Expert Search Engine Optimization
  #94 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2009, 10:02 PM
AVC AVC is offline
WebProWorld Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 468
AVC RepRank 1
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

So you are saying that you and Phil Craven never engaged in reputation abuse at SEW against me William ???
  #95 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2009, 10:05 PM
deepsand's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,226
deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

You, williamc, would have us believe that Dave asked a question that he did not want answered.

You would also have us believe that Dave finds the answer unsatisfactory, but lacks the wherewithall to speak for himself.

Your word carries no credibility. You are but a Sea Lawyer.
  #96 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2009, 10:08 PM
williamc's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: GoogleVille
Posts: 1,585
williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Quote:
Originally Posted by AVC View Post
So you are saying that you and Phil Craven never engaged in reputation abuse at SEW against me William ???
Why in the world would anyone need to do so? You did a perfectly good job of it all by yourself mate.
__________________
William Cross
Expert Search Engine Optimization
  #97 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2009, 10:10 PM
williamc's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: GoogleVille
Posts: 1,585
williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Quote:
Originally Posted by deepsand View Post
You would also have us believe that Dave finds the answer unsatisfactory, but lacks the wherewithall to speak for himself.
Actually no poor boy, Dave has been AFK since right after I spoke to him. He still is to my knowledge. I have no doubt he will pop in here and make sure everyone knows the facts that I have demonstrated, which will also show all of your subsequent posts are yet again, vain attempts to cloud that fact. Sorry, but you have no hope of salvaging this one.
__________________
William Cross
Expert Search Engine Optimization
  #98 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2009, 10:11 PM
deepsand's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,226
deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

You must be quite uncomfortable at DP; no fellow Red Rep Raiders to cover your arse for you, and having to give up rep. in order to give red.
  #99 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2009, 10:14 PM
williamc's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: GoogleVille
Posts: 1,585
williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7williamc RepRank 7
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Not at all. DP provides a place to hire outsourcing. Not much else. If you actually looked at any recent posts by me, you might have figured that out. In fact DP serves my needs quite well in that regard.
__________________
William Cross
Expert Search Engine Optimization
  #100 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2009, 10:16 PM
deepsand's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,226
deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9deepsand RepRank 9
Default Re: WebProWorld Rep System

Dave has visited this thread since I posted my answer to his question; had he something to say about it he'd not send a cabin boy to deliver the message.
Closed Thread

  WebProWorld > Center > WebProWorld: Guidelines/Announcements/Suggestions

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vote Here!!! WebProWorld Reputation System Keimos WebProWorld: Guidelines/Announcements/Suggestions 24 05-16-2007 12:58 PM
WebProWorld Reputation System mike WebProWorld: Guidelines/Announcements/Suggestions 61 05-15-2007 10:13 PM
New to WebProWorld MandyHaga Introductions 5 11-29-2004 12:32 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:54 AM.



Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0