|
|
||||||
|
||||||
| Index Link To US Private Messages Archive FAQ RSS | ||||||
| WebProWorld: Guidelines/Announcements/Suggestions Policy posts and questions as well as Forum news and updates. Also the thread for posting your questions and comments. |
Share Thread: & Tags
|
||||
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
before leaving a comment.
I personally like Matt Cutts Guidelines and comment technology: Guidelines for comments: March 24 2006 Scroll to the bottom of that post and see how he does it. Example, have a link to the WPW Forum Rules and Guidelines above the comment / new post (text field). Read how Wikipedia describes newsgroup and forum spam: "Old Usenet convention defines spamming as excessive multiple posting, that is, the repeated posting of a message (or substantially similar messages)." Could this be improved on WPW that I think is very good already. Regarding the Guidelines: Our SPAM Policy. Are they up to date? Isn't it now legal to have affiliate links in signatures? Should there be a note on - taking a thread off topic - threadjack - hijacking a thread What about splitting posts that are going off topic if it is an important new topic, like Chris did with one post recently? In addition, every time you click a post, it is registered as a new view of the thread. I see that other forums only count one view from one (unique) IP (during a time interval). In my view, that gives a more correct picture of the popularity of a post. |
|
||||
|
Ask Chris, he recently split a post. I think it was relevant and could have been done in other cases as well:
Example: Matt Cutts answer on duplicate detection I think that post could have been split too, with an advantage. I am only a more and more invisible member here. Ken recently called me WPW's "SpamBot", so I had to remove my picture :-) :-) |
|
||||
|
Quote:
I don't care if you have an affiliate lnk in your signature. There has never been any rule forbidding an affiliate link in your signature. The rule (as it is clearly stated) prohibits affiliate links in posts. There is a difference. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
WebProNews Videos |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
WebProNews Videos |
|
||||
|
Sooo, where does the part about having to delete your image and becoming invisible and all that come in?
__________________
WebProNews Videos |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
I got a PM from rah about it that I have replied too. No problem for me if he shows that PM to you. There is nothing secret in it IMO. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"Being an expert isn't telling other people what you know. It's understanding what questions to ask, and flexibly applying your knowledge to the specific situation at hand. Being an expert means providing sensible, highly contextual direction." Jeff Atwood SEO Workers - Search Engine Optimization Consulting Company | SEO Analysis Tool | Webnauts Net SEO |
|
||||
|
Quote:
No, I don't want affiliate links littering the posts. I don't mind -and even encourage- people to link out to things in their posts when the link is relevant to a discussion - but I don't want a bunch of affiliate spam in the posts, no. In your signature, as long as it isn't porn or some other objectionable material and providing you stay within the parameters set forth (no images, 3 lines max, no crazy fonts, etc) I don't really care what you link to in your sig.
__________________
WebProNews Videos |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
WebProWorld |
Advertise |
Contact Us |
About |
Forum Rules |
MVP's |
Archive |
Newsletter Archive |
Top |
WebProNews
WebProWorld is an iEntry, Inc. ® site - © 2009 All Rights Reserved Privacy Policy and Legal iEntry, Inc. 2549 Richmond Rd. Lexington KY, 40509 |