Submit Your Article Forum Rules

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Banned by Matt Cutts! But seriously, any advice?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    179

    Banned by Matt Cutts! But seriously, any advice?

    Well I can’t believe it! Our website has been suddenly banned by Google. Any advice is welcome.

    I believe the site was banned because we use a javascript refresh Flash detector. This detector page had content on it that came from our Flash website because, otherwise the search engines were not indexing the information in our website. And we had researched and found advice that that was a reasonable use of the landing page. (I’m sure there is a better way to do this now, but it was the best way to Flash detect back when we launched the site. And we’ve been ready to post a new, non-flash website for months. The new site has been delayed as client work has been prioritized. Any week now we’ll get it out there… )

    Anyway, I’m blown away and quite humbled and would like to fix this as soon as possible. We try to hold ourselves to high standards and I am very wary of shady schemes in SEO. I have even avoided link exchanges and directories on our site because it always seemed a little grey hat. The point is, we try to stay very clean and were never trying to scam search engines, only trying to index Flash content. In retrospect I can sure see how it looked spammy and have pulled down all content from the top page in hopes that we can gain reinstatement.

    I’ve learned so much from this community and have really appreciated all I’ve learned here. Any tips on how to get us out of this mess are welcome.

    (Oh, one hilarious/paranoid note – I made a post on the Matt Cutts blog asking about how they deal with reports of website spam, by manual bans or through the algorithm. And as if Matt responded by flicking the switch, our site shuts off. Nice. I don't really think he did it but who knows. You get mighty paranoid in a situation like this.)

  2. #2
    Senior Member MtraX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    389
    Hi

    There are more intelligent ways of detecting flash version. You can do it within flash, by created a container that checks version and loads the appropriate movie, without using reloading scripts etc. If the player version is lower than your spec, you could load a warning message with a link to download the latest version.

    Check out http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/fla...detection.html for more information.

    Regards
    MtraX

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    179
    Thanks. I hadn't seen this latest Flash 8 detector info. I'm aware there are better ways to detect Flash now, and it sounds like this new method may even be google friendly. 5 years ago our current script was the best approach.

    I've been hoping to avoid updating this site while we get the new non-flash site through production. Am I really going to have to retool this site to get out of the ban?

  4. #4
    Senior Member MtraX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    389
    Hi

    Yeah, that redirect is a total no-no, especially with having some of your main keywords on it. Usually the flash detection page has no content. Anyway, rather get rid of it totally.

    Another option might be to have a static page with some content and to have an enter button going to the flash site, allthough your site is going to have much better results (ranking) with being coded in HTML. Your index page could have an option of going to flash or html (I would just ditch the flash since it's double work, you can always have a 'flash portfolio' somewhere on the site to showcase your flash skills).

    Make sure that you follow the webmaster guidelines posted by Google. Also remember to do a request for re-inclusion as specified by Matt after the new site is live.

    MtraX

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    179
    Yea, I really hate enter pages that make you click. The experience should be seemless.

    Amd yes, we are ditching the flash. ASAP.

    I don't want to gripe, I know I'm playing the google game here and you win some and lose some. But I thought we were playing it clean and safe. It goes to show you that you really have to second guess any advice even from the so-called experts.

    Also frustrating is that we sure don't go out of our way to scam like our competitors with multiple doorway pages and many paragraphs of fake content.

    Yea, I know the limitations of Flash. But it is a legitimate way to build a website. And if I put a blank detector up there, Google just reads "Flash Detector" or whatever for our home page. I know there are ways out of this. I'm just really shocked and frustrated! And I know I just need to learn from this and see what we are doing that looks deceptive.

    I suppose it is my turn now. I've had such (mostly) great experiences with Google in the past.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    187
    Y! shows 3000+ links to your site, I suspect the reason for the G ban lies somewhere there rather than being Flash based...

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    179
    Quote Originally Posted by glengara
    Y! shows 3000+ links to your site, I suspect the reason for the G ban lies somewhere there rather than being Flash based...
    Really? Is there a limit on links? We haven't engaged in any linking schemes. We do have credit links that appear on some of the websites we've built. Is that now considered link spam?

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    187
    *Is there a limit on links?*

    No, there's no limit on links, but it's slightly strange that you should have quite so many without having engaged in any linking schemes ;-)

    *We do have credit links that appear on some of the websites we've built.*

    That may well explain it, on the other hand 3000+ links may well be overdoing it ...

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    526
    File for reinclusion

  10. #10
    Senior Member greeneagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    5,277
    IMO - There is a serious limit on irrelevant links now... They just don't count much for anything any more... and it really doesn't matter if they are paid, sitewide, spammed and even hidden...relevant is relevant, OBLs and IBLs!

    Ken
    Mountain Eagle Marketing
    Contemporary Art News
    Modern Art News

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. What would be if Matt Cutts...
    By Webnauts in forum The Castle Breakroom (General: Any Topic)
    Replies: 73
    Last Post: 07-22-2009, 01:58 AM
  2. Keywords in URL may help SEO - Matt Cutts
    By dburdon in forum Google Discussion Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-06-2006, 10:26 AM
  3. Who is Matt Cutts
    By Steven1976a in forum Search Engine Optimization Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-20-2006, 08:01 PM
  4. Matt Cutts Goes looking for Ask Jeeves
    By scanmonkey in forum Other Engines/Directories
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-11-2006, 08:27 PM
  5. Matt Cutts Banned On Google? And Oct. 2005 Jagger Update Wi
    By WPW_Feedbot in forum Search Engine Optimization Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-10-2005, 10:00 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •