Submit Your Article Forum Rules

Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: New SEO Trick

  1. #1

    New SEO Trick

    ... at least it's new to me. And very deceitful, too.

    On this website they implement a tactic that achieves the same effect as a META redirect, but without the actual META tag itself.

    They use the following code in their <BODY> tag:
    onmouseover="location.href = 'http://www.burstcorp.com/';"
    Thus, when a user first hits the page, they see the optimized content, but as soon as they move their mouse anywhere on the page, they are taken to the page that this company wants you to see - the 'pretty' page (although it's not very pretty in my opinion).

    Anyway, I've never seen this trick before, and I think it's pretty clever, but I'm sure it'll get them banned soon enough. Mind you, the page does have a page rank of 2, so this strategy obviously isn't accomplishing the intended results.

    Just an FYI for all you SEO junkies out there.
    Robin Eldred
    Web Design & Internet Marketing by Apis Design
    Websites that work

  2. #2
    WebProWorld MVP
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    1,156
    I haven't seen that technique before either.

    Well that "optomized" page has been indexed by google as seen here.

    But, a google search for the first key phrase in their keyword tag, "Web Site Optimization", doesn't show them in the first three pages (I got tired of looking after that). So, like you said, it doesn't look like it has done them a lot of good.

  3. #3
    WebProWorld MVP ronniethedodger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,402

    Re: New SEO Trick

    Quote Originally Posted by apisdesign
    They use the following code in their <BODY> tag:
    onmouseover="location.href = 'http://www.burstcorp.com/';"
    This is nothing new. I have seen similar coding in the <body> tag like this, another is the use of the onload() event which would call a javascript or vbscript function that does the actual re-direction.

    I have seen some even more sneakier than this one, and it exploits (again) the spider's inability to parse javascript.

    A site (actually multiple sites) uses these lines of code following the <body> tag:
    Code:
    	<script>
    	<!--
    	document.write(unescape("%3Cdiv%20style%3D%22position%3Aabsolute%3Bleft%3A-99999%3Btop%3A-99999%3Bwidth%3A1%3Bheight%3A1%3B%22%3E"));
    	//-->
    	</script>
    ... then about 100 textual keyword links (one for each page of the site. Followed by this little tidbit immediately before the closing <body> tag.


    Code:
    	<script>
    	<!--
    	document.write(unescape("%3C/div%3E"));
    	//-->
    	</script>
    	Site is being loaded... please wait or click here to go directly to the main page.</a>.
    	<script>
    	<!--
    	document.write(unescape("%3CMETA%20HTTP-EQUIV%3DRefresh%20CONTENT%3D%220%3B%20URL%3Dhttp://wetrack.it/scumbag-affilliate-accountname/af.cgi?aid=238&redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scumbag-affilliate-sitename.com%2F%22%3E"));
    	//-->
    	</script>
    For those of you who do not know what is going on here, an explanation.

    Javascript is used to write additional Html statements to the browser after the page is loaded. Spiders cannot read this coding.

    First, code is written to the document that positions all of the one-hundred plus links off-screen out of the browsers view.

    Then it writes some text for the browser to view that says "please wait while the site loads...".
    The site is not loading at all, it already is loaded. The wait is for the final piece of code that redirects the browser (via a tracking service) to a scumbag affilliateship site.

    I have tracked down several sites using this method, and all of them are the same. One-hundred plus pages of nothing but keyword links (spiderfood) and absolutely no content.

    They enjoy page one results on just about every keyword and variation on those words that is possible.

    I have seen others before, but this one is by far one of the most ingenious ones to date. It has also lasted longer than the others at Google -- almost two months. It was there before the Florida Update, and still is there now.

    As for the example cited at the beginning of this thread, they are not being dinged for spamming at Google. They are being dinged for bad copy, otherwise it would not even have a PR registering for it. Google will set it to zero, if it thought it was being spammed.



    I will leave you with a few words from this page, and out of their own mouths. You can be the judge on whether it is truth, or if they are actually nothing but a legend in their own mind:

    Quote Originally Posted by from their final paragraph
    To succeed, you need to know what works and what doesnt. We go beyond the ordinary to bring you ideas that shimmer and shine concepts that burst out of the box. We fuse sales with marketing, leadership with management, vision with strategy and tactics.

  4. #4
    Senior Member awall19's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    108
    there are server side redirects and elequent ways of being a scumbag...what this site does with the java redirect is, in a word, STUPID

Similar Threads

  1. How easy is it to trick Google?
    By janeth in forum Google Discussion Forum
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 04-22-2010, 05:21 PM
  2. Trick or Treating
    By coder in forum The Castle Breakroom (General: Any Topic)
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-02-2006, 11:39 AM
  3. Yahoo Not a One-Trick Pony
    By WPW_Feedbot in forum Search Engine Optimization Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-07-2005, 02:00 PM
  4. Check out this trick
    By janeth in forum Google Discussion Forum
    Replies: 86
    Last Post: 01-29-2004, 11:38 AM
  5. Most Ugly trick yet
    By dmcgill in forum Graphics & Design Discussion Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 11-01-2003, 11:27 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •