Submit Your Article Forum Rules

Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: The Better Processor

  1. #1
    Member Silverback's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    31

    The Better Processor

    I am in the throws of replacing three computers. I suppose after 12 years, I have wrung the current ones dry.

    Anyway, is there a better processor between a

    Intel® Core™ i3-2120 (3.30 GHz, 3 MB cache, 2 cores) or a

    AMD Quad-Core A6-3650 APU with Radeon HD 6530D Graphics (2.6 GHz, 4 MB L2 cache)

    The computers are all business driven, do not play games or movies but I need them to operate at peak efficiency.

    Your opinions would be most helpful

    Cheers all
    D
    Ayurvedic Medicinal Herbs - Choose the potency of nature!

  2. #2
    Administrator rah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    2,511
    If all you are doing is browsing the web and creating office documents then you won't notice a difference with either. No harm in going for whichever is cheaper. You'd get more bang for your buck on other parts of the computer like an SSD or more ram.

    Do you do a lot of multitasking, or somewhere down the road plan on doing more intensive tasks? If so that changes things.

  3. #3
    Member Silverback's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    31
    Yes Rah, at any given time there are a minimum of 10 programmes running at a time that are fairly substantial in memory usage
    Ayurvedic Medicinal Herbs - Choose the potency of nature!

  4. #4
    Administrator rah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    2,511
    Then between the two you provided I'd go with the AMD one since it's a quad core. If you don't mind bumping up to the next intel one though, a i5 quad core would be where you would want to go though.

  5. #5
    Member Silverback's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    31
    Great...then that is what I will do. Many thanks for the direction Rah

  6. #6
    WebProWorld MVP edhan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    895
    i3 CPU should be okay. I am more likely to go for more RAM like at least 8 GB or 16GB with Windows 7 64-bit as 32-bit will not utilize more RAM.
    Find Out More About Renting Thai Amulets For Blessing Of Protection in Well Being & Wealth | Destiny of Fate | Exploring, Understanding & Learning The Basic Feng Shui Art Of Placement To Build Wealth & Harmony With Friends, Colleagues And Family Members In Relationships & Careers... Do you want a better lifestyle? Check it out today!

  7. The following user agrees with edhan:
  8. #7
    Administrator rah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    2,511
    If he is going to be doing a lot of multitasking the dual core i3 will not hold up against the quad cores. The price difference isn't that much more, so why not just jump up to the quads?

  9. #8
    Member Silverback's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    31
    The deal is done gentleman. I ended up going with an 1-5 quad core with 8 gigs of Ram, a 1T HD and Windows 7 Pro. It came in this morning and I am in the process of setting it up. I will be installing the XP mode and Virtual PC on the system as well to accommodate any older software.
    I appreciate everyone's input. It was invaluable in coming to the right decision after being on a 10-year old piece of equipment operating Win XP.

    Thanks for the guidance.
    Denis
    Ayurvedic Medicinal Herbs - Choose the potency of nature!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •