www.schubertassociates.com.au | Art collection management

[pschubert]

Hello, and thanks in advance for your response.

I took the very good advice to validate the site with the w3c Validator, which led me to make some needed changes to the html. However, the site still doesn't pass, becuase the Validator doesn't like some of the tags contained in a script. Altering the script renders it inoperable, so I'm not overly concerned with validation anymore (I admit upfront I'm no expert in JavaScript). The site renders properly in the browsers on which I've tested it.

So, those issues aside, I'm really just looking for general observations about the look and content of the site, and any suggestions for improvement.

Thanks again.

[williamc]

For its purpose, I like it.

I would suggest moving some of the JS into external files, as well as all of the css that you have in the tables. But the look and feel is clean, easy to follow, and does what it is supposed to.

[pschubert]

Thanks, William. That sounds like the next logical step. I'm happy to hear that you feel like I'm on target. I aprreciate your comments!

[dojo]

1. Not a fan of bevels in a logo. Not ugly though at all.
2. Please consider using another font. Times New Roman is too outdated and looks ugly on a site
3. Not a fan of dark layouts. In your case, since you don't have a lot of content on the site, it's OK.

Overall elegant design. Looking good