html vs php

[deepsand]

What I find amusing is that someone in post #8 agrees with with post #7, who basically posted the same thing as what deepsand posted in post #6.

That owes to browser induced myopia.

[LD]

But I do get your point as I was going to delete those two posts as they weren't really adding anything productive to the thread other than a "I agree" which we don't stand for here at WPW. Active contributions fellas!

Witnessing the same context every third post with nothing new contributed makes it tough to stay subscribed to the thread. I'm hoping, by asking a few questions for clarification (if I understand the point or not) makes the thread a little more focused and facilitate a little more usable information.

[deepsand]

Witnessing the same context every third post with nothing new contributed makes it tough to stay subscribed to the thread. I'm hoping, by asking a few questions for clarification (if I understand the point or not) makes the thread a little more focused and facilitate a little more usable information.

In that respect, it's tame here compared to the barrage of hit-and-run posters at V7N.

[LD]

In that respect, it's tame here compared to the barrage of hit-and-run posters at V7N.

OMG. I only visited there once or twice and don't remember much. Senior moment?

[deepsand]

OMG. I only visited there once or twice and don't remember much. Senior moment?

Or, blinded by the dazzling display of tripe.

[LD]

Although looking at Deepsand's reputation, if one is apt enough, should be able to make a decent determination as to whether he should be trusted

The green rep and the articulate nature of the reply of a vet member (in this case DS), the trust aspect should be crystal clear. Or in this case, clear as a green gemstone.

I’ve witnessed SteveG recently giving advice to correct a member’s post and then the following 3 posters were agreeing with the post that was incorrect, totally skipping Steve’s remarks entirely, and there was quite a bit of time inbetween responses.

[deepsand]

I've witnessed SteveG recently giving advice to correct a member’s post and then the following 3 posters were agreeing with the post that was incorrect, totally skipping Steve's remarks entirely, and there was quite a bit of time inbetween responses.

A typical poster merely skims the opening post at best - many just glance at the Title - and promptly seeks out the nearest "Reply" Button/Panel.

Of the few given to first doing some additional reading, that portion steadily declines in direct proportion to the length of the thread. By the time a thread reaches its 3rd page, exceedingly few newcomers read more than the OP's opener.

Having a "Reply" function presented atop the thread, as does WPW here do, simply encourages such behavior.

[submissionbay]

No sense to compare static with dynamic

[LD]

No sense to compare static with dynamic

Compare static with dynamic what?

[deepsand]

No sense to compare static with dynamic

If by that you mean that the matter of static vs. dynamic page content is irrelevant to the issue of HTML vs. PHP file extensions, you are correct, as both can be used for either content type.