699,990 of them do not have any traffic to send in the least. Wasting any time on each specifically is doing any client a major disservice.
And all of the others use the same methods of gathering data as the big three. They spider a page, index it in their own way, and display it according to their algo's. Again, wasting time on each specifically is a disservice to the client.
Read above re: disservice.
ISP? UTF? The encoding of a page means less than zero in the SERPS. Hosting ISP Location has some effect but minimal, not enough to worry over in the least.
And this has what to do with how you optimize a site exactly, with the exception of PR which is a calculation of links at Google only?
William Cross
Web Development by Those Damn Coders
Firearm Friendly Websites because our constitution matters
Robots.txt is an user agent agnostic standard. A crawler/robot/spider is either compliant and well behaved or not. Trying to design for all of those which may not be both is an exercise in futility.Originally Posted by brofarops
WILLIAM: Thank You for your opinion and I will take your words into consideration from an SEO consult standpoint. The actual topic however is about DuckDuckGo and use thereof. I use it, and many other search engines including SuperPages. I know several individuals and companies that use Iquick Itorrentz and others. Again William, I appreciate your opinion and to get back on topic.
In the interest of determining the depth and breadth of DDG's database, I would again ask if has anyone has ever seen DuckDuckBot visit either WebProWorld or their own site(s)?
DDG-Bots shows up in some of my counters
- - - Updated - - -
DDG-Bots shows up in some of my counters
I show only one site out of +- 20 I watch with their referer
William Cross
Web Development by Those Damn Coders
Firearm Friendly Websites because our constitution matters
I've yet to see DDG show up here at WPW.