Joomla Driven Laser Clinic Site For Review

[mamola500]

Bizarre post, whats a frat chum?

[Martinscholes]

Bizarre post, whats a frat chum?

It's clearly something drunken Americans have. Has nowt to do with us British people, I think.

Your site is OK. You use stock shots? And so what? Can't see a problem with that, really.

[weegillis]

1. define: chum
2. define: frat

Rarely the leader of the pack, but dependent upon one. Needing constant approval. Only comfortable when rules are being broken. Not the person we would recruit to market our high end services.

The point really is, if I read @Dcrux correctly, study your market and present to them as they would expect, or all is lost. Social networks are not where one would turn to sell laser surgery, any more than a high end glossy magazine would be used to sell peanut butter.

[foruwave]

This is a cool looking site with plenty of clean content. It is sharp and looks very professional. It really adds to the authenticity of the site having a bright and clean display coupled with such sharp images. If you build it they will come only when they know where you are and I feel they will know you are credible the instant they see your site. Great work.

[mamola500]

thanks mate

[weegillis]

Some follow up comments, in no particular order:

1. The Home page has a minimum (required) width of ~1140 pixels to display correctly in FF 3.6. Haven't tested others. For the sake of 1024x768 users, you might want to thin out the left & right padding/margins on cells and wrapper, and get everything to fit into ~990 pixels. The rest of the site is unaffected because their is no DOM slider.

I'm not sure the plug-in is keeping within bounds, either, which may be a large part of the problem. The fix could be as simple as loading order. Be sure ALL style sheets are downloaded before initiating any JavaScript. This way the DOM array will contain the complete initial cascade. The order in which CSS is loaded determines the cascade, so check that this is all in order, too.

2. The generator meta data is not necessary. It helps to identify the template, and consequently back end code. One of the many security tips for CMS I've run across. Likewise, if it is not required, all template comments can be removed, for the same reason.

3. The accessibility links are a great thing to have, but the verbosity is a little heavy, and repetitive. I would drop the title attribute and let the link phrase be read out. The title attribute will always be read aloud unless the user has title attributes turned off in their reader. If the CSS uses 'display:none;', none of this will not happen. Be sure to use either negative indent or 'visibility: hidden;'.

4. I've begun to believe that it makes no sense to link to validation pages. The issues can be handled on publication, the pages made valid, or as nearly so as can be allowed (barring things like empty span tags, etc.) and all is well. No wasted outbounds.


Nitpicking, I admit, but what else can one say about a site that is otherwise very good?

[AustinSmith]

I think you have not mentioned all the required references,Your title must be descriptive.I hope you would solve your problem of getting specific site very soon.

[aditd]

I took a look on your site and you managed to do what you wanted "What im aiming for is a professional looking clean site"