please review the logo

[gudipudi]

Hi Guys,

Could some one provide me the feed back on the logo attached we have designed.

[parallelworlds]

The concept is good... but as the attachment illustrates it doesn't hold up to the shrink test. It's Very hard to read. Change the font to bold and that should hold up to the shrink test.

[keyon]

I agree with parallelworlds...you need a different font. At first glance, it almost looks like "red @ red" -- I had to look really close to figure out what the words actually are. Also, I think it's kind of important that if a logo includes a company name, there should be some logical connection to that company's website domain. For example, if you look at the "WebProWorld" logo, you can pretty much assume the website address is probably webproworld.com. The name Real @ Real is a little confusing in that regard. Kind of hard to figure out what the web address is from the logo.

[J_Paul]

I like the circles, but I'd rather see them to the right.. then have your text beside that so it's easier to read.. and since Real @ Real isn't very descriptive, you might want to add a tag line or web address so users know exactly what they are looking at.

Say.. have the three circles as an icon... and the text to the right.. also, you may want to look at using a different font. That one is very thin.