Submit Your Article Forum Rules

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 36 of 36

Thread: Image optimaztion necessary?

  1. #31
    Administrator LD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Still the same.
    Posts
    4,258
    It is a coding issue that is facilitating these results. Some older pages with an older configuration of the doc declaration show the alt tag on mouse-over.
    Last edited by LD; 10-15-2011 at 11:21 AM. Reason: add
    Local Web Design Company in Markham, Toronto and Richmond Hill
    Markham-based Search Engine Optimization company servicing Toronto, the GTA including Richmond Hill
    Why a business needs a good Facebook Fan Page. IFM serves Markham, Toronto and the GTA.

  2. #32
    Administrator weegillis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    5,785
    Not to blow my own horn, but way back when we ran this experiment. Perhaps it's time to update it?

    post: alt and title attribute in img and a tags

  3. #33
    WebProWorld MVP deepsand's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    State College, PA
    Posts
    16,446
    Considering how much has changed in the world of browsers since then, perhaps so.

    Did a quick search last night for a table of comparisons re. different browsers/versions handling of these attributes; best I found was from 2003!

  4. #34
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    1
    Image optimization is the processing of compressing (or reducing the file size) of graphics (especially photographs) for display on web pages.

    When you view a webpage on the internet, copies of all the graphics used to display the page are downloaded and stored temporarily on your computer. If the web page you are viewing contains a lot of photographs (eg, in photo galleries) the amount of time it will take to fully display the page will depend on the optimized file size of all the photos.

    Photo files from digital cameras by default use a very high resolution (the "pixels") to ensure that the image is very sharp when it is printed. This means these files (usually jpg's) from digital camers are about 2-3 mb in size. These jpg's need to be optimized before they are displayed on a web-page, where the high resolution required by printing isn't an issue.

  5. #35
    Administrator weegillis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    5,785
    While we cannot argue with the explanation you give, @stylabrite, I believe you miss the point of the OP question: optimizing images for search. This relates to how well documented the images are within the pages. Do they have captions? Do they have title attribute text? Do they have alternate text? Are they in a context that relates to the images (i.e., surrounded by text that describes what's in the photo)? These are all things that help optimize images for search engines.

  6. #36
    Junior Member ryanlb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Victoria, B.C., Canada
    Posts
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by weegillis View Post
    While we cannot argue with the explanation you give, @stylabrite, I believe you miss the point of the OP question: optimizing images for search. This relates to how well documented the images are within the pages. Do they have captions? Do they have title attribute text? Do they have alternate text? Are they in a context that relates to the images (i.e., surrounded by text that describes what's in the photo)? These are all things that help optimize images for search engines.
    Couldn't have said it better myself. There may be some other coding issues to consider, but from an optimization point of view, you want them SEs crawling your images and recognizing all the keywords that go with them, which necessitates the captions, alternate text, and other descriptive image fields.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •