Hi Incredible:
My server was hacked recently so my server shut it down. I had planner to move because of the hack, but unfortunately didn't get everything copied before they shut me down.
Type: Posts; User: jackson992; Keyword(s):
Hi Incredible:
My server was hacked recently so my server shut it down. I had planner to move because of the hack, but unfortunately didn't get everything copied before they shut me down.
I was talking to my firend last night and we got on to the subject of 404s. Currently I redirect them to my home page. I get tons of 404s and hate to lose the traffic. Comments or opinions?
so is there two parts you have to code? It says above a section for html and a section for css?
ok I must be a bit slow but how does this help? I don't see an advantage on doing it this way versus regular tables? Looks like the same coding except for the table class part.
Will that help with that convoluted table? I want to condense that coding but still want it to look the same.
Sitmap pages rank great. These are our highest ranking pages on every search engine. witho no text just the links leading to the corresponding page with their anchor text.
I want to cut down on the coding. Someone told me to put that code in a file and rename it with a css extension. The very first line is css.
I'm posting for help here cause Webnauts told me too lol
I took the code I previously had for my css and inserted it into a text file called right.css but cannot get it to pull it up.
...
Hi guys:
I've been trying to get the css in an external file but for some reason I can't get it to work. It works for an ordinary include but not in the format of:
<link rel="stylesheet"...
So you don't agree with this site?
http://www.seoworkers.com/search-engine-optimization-tools/analyzer.html
Unfortunately all I know is tables so they have to stay LOL
I ran a tool last night and it says all my sites have a bad text to code ratio so was wondering how to do this. Can anyone point me in the right direction?
Right of course my my main site has no off topic links because it's a mall site. I place all the links tho on my links page and usually lead them to the home page.
Heck no I don't know what links I've asked for LOL. And Yahoo shows way too many to go through lol.
The problem with linking is there is no way to measure it. I can look on Yahoo and get a count but obviously it isn't enough and there are thousands of them.
For me this is why Google is so difficulkt. Getting links is not easy, writing content and other on page factors is. This is why I always favor msn and Yahoo.
Just took a look at your site DMC. You may be over optimized for Msn. This topic came up recently with a good friend an SEO expert I visit with. I didn't check the keyword density but you may want to...
I can't believe you really believe this DMC. Google is the hardest engine to do SEO for, Msn being the easiest and Yahoo being the middle. We had a poll on this on SEW and the voting agreed. The...
The biggest problem is Harry and David has no text on their home page. Msn loves text. Also the phrase gift baskets is not in their metas. Lastly gift baskets is not in their title.
I love MSN. At least their rankings make sense:)
Mr. B summed it up nicely. Any sales under $100 $5 is fine but above that you definitely need to have it be a %. A $200 sale would be $10 commish at 5%. This is double what you have it at now.
I love your stuff and have been adding stuff by hand but you really need a feed.
I took the sitemap off of Google sitemaps to see if that helps.
John:
You posted $5 per oder. I hope you meant 5%? If you are selling products you need to have % based offers based on the amount of products an affiliate sells.
Hi Peter:
I posted this over at Search Engine Watch but since it is so relevant I will repeat it here. How do you measure links besides quantity. Or should I say how do we know if a link is a good...
Hi Webnauts:
Yes sorry I had a typo in there. Yes that is the site I meant. Notice if you do a site command for the site that nothing comes up. That is why I said it was banned.