Search:

To the contrary, other than the traffic between you and Google itself when you are using one or more of Google's services, it is impossible without engaging in illegal activities.

I suggest that...

That owes to the speed with which links are accumulated, not the method used for acquiring them.


Setting aside the fact that a bot is a dumb entity that simply fetches files on command, indexing...

The use of <B> and/or <I> is irrelevant to content optimization as it is understood by nearly all.

Said tools show any link that they've discovered that their indexing engine has not identified as being advertising. (Some even count URLs cited as text as being links, rather than counting only...

That makes no sense, given that, without its ad revenues, Google would cease to exist. The sole purpose of Google's operating an SE is so that it has a platform for publishing advertising content.

Not really. Bing simply supplies Yahoo with organic and PPC SERPs, to which Yahoo adds custom content of its own choosing, the most notable of which is ad content.


As already noted, Yahoo no...

What do you mean by an "advanced version?"

Stop whoever is using your machine(s) that uses(shares) that IP Address from engaging in click fraud.

Penguin 4, With Penguin 2.0 Generation Spam-Fighting, Is Now Live

Also, see Google’s Matt Cutts: Black Hat & Link Spammers Less Likely To Show Up In Search Results After Summer and What should we...

There's nothing new about this.

Google shot its ***k off by patenting the PageRank algorithm - a naturally occurring mathematical expression that doesn't even meet the basic requirements for...

Shouldn't the number of pages be dependent on the amount and types of content?


Do so only sparing; and, make sure that the smallest font is easily readable by the overwhelming majority of users....

The OP inquired as to Yahoo's "algorithm," which ceased to exist once it discontinued its own crawling and indexing operation.

Not only does this not address the OP's question, which has already been answered, but repeats what others have previously said.

Did you read the thread before posting?

Why are you just repeating what's already been well said?

Huh? :confused:

Advertise.

Are both or either of you suggesting that only free links can bring qualified traffic? :confused:

Have you confused <b> and/or <i> with h1, h2, h3, ... ? To the best of my knowledge, there is no evidence to suggest that Google uses formatting tags as a ranking element.

Relative references are resolved by the user agent, such as a browser, prior to a request being made to the server. And, the time required for doing so is negligible.

That's the key; It's implicit rather than being explicit. More that reference to a different hostname and it points to a different resource.

Setting aside the fact that there is nothing nefarious about redirects, relative references involve no redirection.

Just how does any of this help the OP determine the reason(s) for loss of SERP rank? :confused:

An absolute reference is one that does not need to be resolved. Any path that does not include the hostname is relative.

How does this answer the OP's very specific question as to how to increase traffic?

Precisely what bothered you? And, how did that lead you to conclude that a robots.txt exclusion was involved?