How do you see it?

[mindsoul]

Hotel Lignano (http://www.hotel-lignano.it/)

I want to ask you about this site i build now.
When i start working i didn't think so much to accesibility and this stuff.
Now i build it compatible with:
-resolution start 800x600
-high contrast between background and foreground
-compatimble with latest version IE,firefox,opera,netscape
-i respect all checkpoints from accesibility guidelines wcag 1.0 level a and more...
-i tested with bobby webxact
-i tested with cintya
-it's validated xhtml 1.0
-it's validated css
-it's semantic

the problem is that i can not test with internet connection and higher resolution.
i would like to ask if you can see the site corectly on you computers and browser.
thank you for your time.

[ADAM Web Design]

You can't have validated that code. The tracking script comes before the DOCTYPE declaration. That's invalid right there.

As far as how it looks in a higher res (1024 x 768), the top and bottom bars are centered, so what happens is they appear to be moved over too far to the right. Left-justify those bars.

Other than that, you're fine from an appearance point of view. You will definitely need to check your code again, though.

[mindsoul]

i validated with the w3c validator and is showing valid.
i don't understand what you mean.
thank's

[Webnauts]

You still have some problems in your code:

5 ERRORS:
Lines 123,138,153,168,183: The "id" or "name" attribute value "form" has already been used in this document. A tag's "id" or "name" value ("name" only for certain elements such as "a") must be unique within the document. A tag cannot have an "id" or, with certain elements, a "name" attribute value that has already been used. Note that the "id" values are not case sensitive (except when used to link to an anchor) and that "id" and some "name" attribute values share the same namespace.

41 WARNINGS:
Lines 17,38,42,83,87,102,117,119,132,134,147,149,162,163 ,164,170,177,203,204,211,295,298: For backward compatibility with HTML, use a space character before the '/' character.

[mindsoul]

i don't understand were do you sow this erors.
can you give me the url and with what did you tested?
thanks a lot.

[webhost1]

Go here and check your code out

http://www.netmechanic.com/toolbox/html-code.htm

[mindsoul]

How can i trust a tool that is not valid??
look:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.netmechanic.com%2Ftoolb ox%2Fhtml-code.htm

[brian.mark]

How can i trust a tool that is not valid??
look:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.netmechanic.com%2Ftoolb ox%2Fhtml-code.htm

That's funny. But most of us trust Google as a search engine, and their code isn't valid either.

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=%28detect+automatically%29

NetMechanic was the first HTML validator I remember seeing, and it does indeed validate code well. If you read what those errors are, yes they are errors and yes they should be corrected. The warnings probably aren't as big of a deal (unless you see traffic from older browsers, but that's going to be specific to your site - ours has about 7% from old browsers that would have problems with those). The form id or name should be fixed, especially if you want to use any sort of form validation before they're submitted.

Brian.

[abacusdesk]

Hi,

Your website is well designed and is opening finr on all resolutions and browsers.

Great work keep up !


Manu Mayank

www.abacusdesk.com

[mindsoul]

i've made the english version.
(the description form hotels it's not mine)

I woud'like to ask you if it seams corect to you?

[Webnauts]

Try this free validator: http://www.htmlvalidator.com/lite/

[KeithO]

i personally would drop the absolute linking.

[MarcieZoob]

Webnauts, thanks for the link - that validator is much more user friendly than any I've been using. I like the helpful hints on how to fix an error (yes, I found one on my personal site...).