Contact Us Forum Rules Search Archive
WebProWorld Part of WebProNews.com
Page One Link To Us Edit Profile Private Messages Archives FAQ RSS Feeds  
 

Go Back   WebProWorld > Webmaster, IT and Security Discussion > Web Programming Discussion Forum
Subscribe to the Newsletter FREE!


Register FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Chatbox Mark Forums Read

Web Programming Discussion Forum Working with an API? Developing a plugin? Writing a Mod or script for your favorite blog, Web 2.0 site or Forum? Welcome.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-10-2005, 12:36 AM
WebProWorld Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 27
tinplane RepRank 0
Default What keeps the best stats?

Greetings to all,
Can someone tell me what is the most accurate way to keep website statistics? I don't want a million different parameters just basic stats.
Is the webilizer provided by my web hosting company accurate? It doesn't always agree with other sources.
Thank you in advance for your time,
Dan
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-10-2005, 06:28 PM
ADAM Web Design's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,217
ADAM Web Design RepRank 0
Default

I've never been a big fan of Webalizer myself. But as far as being accurate goes, it's probably as accurate as your other sources simply because it draws from your raw log files, whereas external counters such as Hitbox (I can't think of any others off the top of my head) don't.

As far as the free ones go, I personally like the look and feel of AW Stats the best, and IIRC it also draws from the raw logs.

So my suggestion to you would be to find two programs that draw from raw logs and compare. You should (in theory, because reality indicates something totally different) find they're equal.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-10-2005, 10:43 PM
ADAM Web Design's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,217
ADAM Web Design RepRank 0
Default

As far as accuracy is concerned, I would think your best stats would come from Webalizer, or any other server software that draws the stats from your raw logs.

Offsite counters/stat packs such as Hitbox don't allow for this, and many of the cookies/installation files are destroyed and/or blocked by various anti-spyware programs.

So if it were up to me, I'd say "if Webalizer looks pretty enough to you, leave it alone because it's probably right."
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2005, 09:52 AM
Faglork's Avatar
WebProWorld Veteran
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Forchheim, Germany
Posts: 947
Faglork RepRank 0
Default

But dont forget to have a look at the webalizer.conf ... the default parameters might not be appropriate. Just go through them. Especially the part where you specify your page type (.html, .shtml etc. etc.)

AFAIK the default search engine query strings have to be updated.

As long as you do not need hard facts and your interest is to spot trends, webalizer is ok.

Alex
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2005, 02:10 PM
WebProWorld Pro
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 114
kservik RepRank 0
Default

I think Awstats are much easier to read and it is free.
__________________
Neteffects - Europe Search Marketing
Europe Business Directory
Ranking Directories - Resource of Search Engine Ranking Directories.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2005, 06:41 PM
WebProWorld New Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Gainesville Florida USA
Posts: 19
Phil Tanny RepRank 0
Default

Treat yourself to the best (imho).

I got weary of stats programs like those mentioned, and others like them, and went with Urchin.

Urchin is quite expensive if you buy it yourself, something like $900. I don't like Urchin that much I must admit.

However, I searched for hosts that offer free Urchin stats, and that worked great.

There is a list of Urchin powered hosts on the Urchin site: Urchin.com They were very responsive to my questions too, even though it was clear I wasn't going to be a buyer.

I went with micfo.com and have been happy so far, about 6 months. Free Urchin stats for all my domains.

I'm not qualified to say if Urchin stats are really the most powerful etc, but they seem quite user friendly to me, so I actually use my stats now.

Anyway, that's another alternative.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2005, 08:52 PM
DrTandem1's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
 

Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Encinitas, CA
Posts: 1,908
DrTandem1 RepRank 2
Default

Your main concern, it would appear from your question, is how many people are visiting your site. Most hosts provide an accurate measuring of this. They simply count unique IP addresses that visit your site.

I often hear people boast that their site has received X million hits. This means very little. A "hit" is a file being accessed. Depending on your site and its configuration, one visit could equate to hundreds of hits.

So, for your purposes, look at unique visits. It is possible that with DHCP, you could get different visitors using the same IP; however, if you have that much traffic that this occurs, then you should have no concerns about how much traffic you are receiving.
__________________
DrTandem's San Diego Web Page Design, drtandem.com
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-12-2005, 04:32 AM
WebProWorld New Member
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 16
pln123 RepRank 0
Default

You might find StatCounter suitable for your purposes. It's free (to a point) and gives quite comprehensive, realtime stats.

You'll have to insert the code supplied into all the pages you want to track.

Perry
__________________
Small Business CRM
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-12-2005, 05:56 AM
Jason Tor's Avatar
WebProWorld Veteran
 

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 444
Jason Tor RepRank 0
Default

I agree with finding a hosting company that offers a good stats package for free.

I use ww w.fxstudios.net - they have around 6-7 free stat services through c-panel and the actual hosting customer service is outstanding.

Hope this helps.

Jason Tor
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-12-2005, 03:33 PM
WebProWorld New Member
 

Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13
malmazan RepRank 0
Default Re: What keeps the best stats?

My host provides webalizer and awsats. I use both. One thing about awstats is that it separates search spider traffic from actual human traffic.

I wish there was something more powerful though. For instance, i would like to be able to see a monthly tred curve for a specific page. Right now i manually read the resuls evere month and add them to a spreadsheet, but it is a huge pain.

One good thing about Urchin that i know is that you can see traffic per folder. That's great for finding out how an area of the site is doing. To achieve that with Webalizer/AWStats i had to create subdomains which are a pain (they show up on a separate stats page, they need their own robots.txt, 404 error files etc)

Quote:
Originally Posted by tinplane
Greetings to all,
Can someone tell me what is the most accurate way to keep website statistics? I don't want a million different parameters just basic stats.
Is the webilizer provided by my web hosting company accurate? It doesn't always agree with other sources.
Thank you in advance for your time,
Dan
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 03-12-2005, 04:49 PM
WebProWorld Member
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 72
Maloney RepRank 0
Default

I found this a few weeks ago and so far I love it:

http://www.tracewatch.com/

I'm one of those people that can't make sense out of webalizer and awstats is ok. But this one is very nice. Path analysis, the whole shebang.

And btw - it's free! lol
__________________
Fabaroo.com Fabaroo Articles NiftyShops.com Fabarooni.com
*Currently Under Maintenance, No Submissions Just Yet
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 03-13-2005, 01:21 AM
davebarnes's Avatar
WebProWorld MVP
WebProWorld MVP
 

Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Denver, Colorado USA
Posts: 1,475
davebarnes RepRank 3davebarnes RepRank 3davebarnes RepRank 3
Default

tinplane,

Your question: Can someone tell me what is the most accurate way to keep website statistics?

Answer: raw log data

Then, you use software to reduce the log data to pretty charts and tables.

Ah, software.
All the "log analyzer" programs will produce different results because each makes different ASSUMPTIONS.

Pick one. Set the filters to what you want. Stick with it. Don't change the filters. Now, you can compare month to month.

,dave

P.S. I have used WebTrends ($3500/5M page views) for the last 5 years and really like it. Of course, I only paid $1300 for umlimited use.

P.P.S. Pick one and stick with it.

P.P.P.S. I just realized that I did not answer your question: "What keeps [I think you mean "presents"] the best stats?" The answer is, whatever pleases your customer the most.
__________________
Dave Barnes
+1.303.744.9024
http://www.marketingtactics.com
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 03-14-2005, 04:37 AM
WebProWorld Pro
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 259
chiron RepRank 1
Default

I agree with the log files and other presented solutions, have used Urchin and a ton of freebies and paid services, and I think all of the above is good advice. Urchin was especially good, I thought.

That said, if you want to go with a non-visible (your choice), affordable hit counter that requires minimal input from you, I'll toss into the ring a company like 123count.com or web-stat.com, both of which seem to be the same underlying software. For reasons of client requests I happen to use both, sigh.

These aren't my personal geek favorites, but clients like them, print-outs look nice, the reports are near-geek-level yet very visual for any sort of presentation, etc - and they are quite accurate, and in the case of web-stat, for $9.90/month or whatever I was/am paying, the one time I needed billing-related client support was surprisingly quick and professional.

But like my web-brother here in Denver noted, raw log data rules.
Hiya to davebarnes, btw. Nothing beats a nice warm, sunny, snow day, am I right?
__________________
The Chiron Group
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2005, 02:14 PM
WebProWorld Member
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 40
tomzo RepRank 0
Default Stats

I use gowebtools.com which provides only 32,000 free hits but I think it's very cheap to purchase more. I've found it to be very clear and simple, though I have noticed it miss the odd visitor.

Rental property London UK
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 04-14-2005, 01:40 PM
WebProWorld Member
 

Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 60
Adamwlad RepRank 0
Default

I also have webalizer for my web site but I also use StatCounter.com which gives pretty good stats, and it's free. You'll just have to paste some code in there and you're all set.

-Adam
__________________
Adam, President of Adam's Web Company
http://www.adamswebcompany.com
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 04-14-2005, 02:09 PM
adbart's Avatar
WebProWorld Veteran
 

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 480
adbart RepRank 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maloney
I found this a few weeks ago and so far I love it:

http://www.tracewatch.com/

I'm one of those people that can't make sense out of webalizer and awstats is ok. But this one is very nice. Path analysis, the whole shebang.

And btw - it's free! lol
I love this! Thanks so much for mentioning it...
__________________
Car Modifications - Car Accessories - Performance Engine Tuning - Car Styling:
Car Styling | Car Pictures
Reply With Quote
Reply

  WebProWorld > Webmaster, IT and Security Discussion > Web Programming Discussion Forum
Tags: , ,



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0