|
|
||||||
|
||||||
| Index Link To US Private Messages Archive FAQ RSS | ||||||
| Submit Your Site For Review Need a fresh set of eyeballs to take a look at your site? Have a specific issue or question about some aspect of your layout, design or interface? This is the forum for you. When submitting your site, be sure to discuss what aspect you are looking for input on. Just posting a link with the word 'review' isn't appropriate. |
Share Thread: & Tags
|
||||
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
http://www.bullmarketer.com
A Brand New site with thousands of resources for webmasters. Thousands of freebies as well. Check it out, let us know what you think! Kind Regards, Derek Arnold <Mod edit to comply with Site Review Rule #1 - Masterpeace> |
|
|||
|
Tested in IE6 56k modem 800x600. A little slow to load. Forum looks good if a little standard. Some useful links. A good design. All you need now is lots of visitors to get the forum buzzing. Good luck with it.
Nick |
|
|||
|
The site didn't zoomin fast but once it got there I saw a nice bright colorful site.
The Low Cost Web Hosting link was dead. Can I suggest http://www.dreamhost.com/ or http://lowesthosting.com/. Both have affiliate programs, if that's what you're looking for. The gif that said 'free' took away from the otherwise cool graphics. I liked the top graphic and the frustrated guy on the desk. |
|
|||
|
I like the site. Free clipart without the annoying pop-ups. I bookmarked the site because of that. Just needs a little more work on the load time but everything else looks good.
Jonathan Kingsbury www.jonswebdesign.com |
|
||||
|
Normally, I would say that there were too many moving things, but since you offer the animations I suppose it fits. Good layout.
I do not know about the load time. It only took 6 seconds for me on DSL. Nothing wrong with that. The main problem I have is that the menu is not consistant. Sometimes on the left sometimes on the right. I had to look for it on each page. Not good. Here are some search engine areas to improve: 1) You are spamming the keyword webmaster. You are using it 16 times when the maximum is 6 times. This keyword may be rejected by the search engines. 2) You are spamming the keyword resources. You are using it 7 times when the maximum is 6 times. This keyword may be rejected by the search engines. 3) You are spamming the keyword free. You are using it 21 times when the maximum is 6 times. This keyword may be rejected by the search engines. 4) You are spamming the keyword website. You are using it 9 times when the maximum is 6 times. This keyword may be rejected by the search engines. 5) You are spamming the keyword tools. You are using it 16 times when the maximum is 6 times. This keyword may be rejected by the search engines. 6) You are spamming the keyword web. You are using it 10 times when the maximum is 6 times. This keyword may be rejected by the search engines. 8) You are spamming the keyword affiliate. You are using it 8 times when the maximum is 6 times. This keyword may be rejected by the search engines. 9) Your Description is too long and may be cut short or not included in some search engines. You are using 268 characters when the maximum is only 250. 10) You have 69 keywords that you do not use anywhere on your page at all. 11) The file size is almost 200Kb when it should only be 40Kb 12) Your download time is twice what is recommended. Considering that you want to attract webmasters, this kind of hurts your credibility. That and the fact that a validator finds 60 errors within the code. Hope some of this helps.
__________________
Kingman When a man's fight begins within himself, then he is worth something BIZMOX Systems ...Ahead of the curve http://www.bizmox-systems.com |
|
|||
|
I agree with janeth, consistency is normally a great thing. :)
I would also suggest moving what your site is all about to make it stand out more? No, please, don't [b] it 5 times, but move it somewhere else. In its current position, it is rather inconspicuous. On the dotted border on the home page of the lower table, it should be 1 pixel wide, not 2, which I believe it is (by sight). Hope this helps. :) |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
WebProWorld |
Advertise |
Contact Us |
About |
Forum Rules |
MVP's |
Archive |
Newsletter Archive |
Top |
WebProNews
WebProWorld is an iEntry, Inc. ® site - © 2009 All Rights Reserved Privacy Policy and Legal iEntry, Inc. 2549 Richmond Rd. Lexington KY, 40509 |