iEntry 10th Anniversary Forum Rules Search
WebProWorld
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read
Submit Your Site For Review Need a fresh set of eyeballs to take a look at your site? Have a specific issue or question about some aspect of your layout, design or interface? This is the forum for you. When submitting your site, be sure to discuss what aspect you are looking for input on. Just posting a link with the word 'review' isn't appropriate.

Share Thread: & Tags

Share Thread:

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-03-2005, 02:54 AM
WebProWorld New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 8
Paulbisch RepRank 0
Default validation

After checking my site on several recommended validator tools, I got somehow stuck... The results I got tell me that something is wrong but I just can't figure out how to interpret..must have to do with doctype stuff. Can anyone give a hint? Paul www.maplesplendor.ca
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-03-2005, 03:37 AM
paulhiles's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 2,089
paulhiles RepRank 0
Default Content-Type is required

Hi Paul, welcome to WebProWorld!

I think the validators are stumbling over the lack of any content-type. Basically, this tells the validator what content it's about to come across. In most cases, for standard web pages this content will be "text/html". A character set also helps tell any browser / parser what sort of characters it will expect. In this instance, Western Latin-1 (ISO-8859-1) is most likely an appropriate choice.

I've included a snippet below of the few lines at the start of your page with an additional line for the content-type and character set (charset).

Code:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equip="Content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title> Waldorf Supplies for Canadians</title>
Hope that helps!

Paul
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-03-2005, 03:28 PM
WebProWorld New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 8
Paulbisch RepRank 0
Default validation

Thanks Paul, It helped a lot. I changed the coding in all the pages. The char encoding error message has gone. Do I need to worry about the error message:This page is not Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional ? greetings from Paul in Canada
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-03-2005, 03:39 PM
paulhiles's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 2,089
paulhiles RepRank 0
Default

Hey Paul from Canada!

The only error you've got at the moment is from your Javascript email obfuscation. Not exactly a major error, so I wouldn't worry unduly.

Cheers,

Paul from London
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-03-2005, 03:55 PM
WebProWorld New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 8
Paulbisch RepRank 0
Default

Thanks a lot. Can I ask you one more question? What is the difference between strict and loose in doctype. is it right to use strict for pages with animation, slideshow and that stuff? Is every page independant or do I need to decide what doctype I use? Paul
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-03-2005, 04:43 PM
paulhiles's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 2,089
paulhiles RepRank 0
Default Coding according to a doctype

I wouldn't go so far as to say that one doctype is more suitable for a certain kind of media than another. You just need to code in accordance with the demands of the doctype (if that makes any sense!).

Generally speaking, a transitional doctype is more forgiving than a 'strict' doctype, and if you're looking to both present and future standards then you should be using XHTML rather than HTML 4.01.

Paul
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-04-2005, 09:44 AM
DrTandem1's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Encinitas, CA
Posts: 1,830
DrTandem1 RepRank 2
Default

I see eight (8) errors on your splash page. Most are minor and reside in the body tag. The W3C validator tells you exactly where the problems are.

Do you need to worry because it does not validate? Maybe. You have a better chance of being cross-browser compatible, if your pages validate.

What is more perplexing is why you bother with the splash page which redirects to the contact page. I would recommend simply creating a normal Home page and lose the splash page.
__________________
DrTandem's San Diego Web Page Design, drtandem.com
Closed Thread

  WebProWorld > Site Design > Submit Your Site For Review

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:20 PM.



Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0