Contact Us Forum Rules Search Archive
WebProWorld Part of WebProNews.com
Page One Link To Us Edit Profile Private Messages Archives FAQ RSS Feeds  
 

Go Back   WebProWorld > Site Design > Submit Your Site For Review
Subscribe to the Newsletter FREE!


Register FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Chatbox Mark Forums Read

Submit Your Site For Review Need a fresh set of eyeballs to take a look at your site? Have a specific issue or question about some aspect of your layout, design or interface? This is the forum for you. When submitting your site, be sure to discuss what aspect you are looking for input on. Just posting a link with the word 'review' isn't appropriate.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2004, 04:08 PM
WebProWorld New Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Uk
Posts: 9
coldclimber RepRank 0
Default www.cold-climbs.com - Don't Laugh

Hi I am new to this site, and it has made some intresting reading I noticed alot of hype about PR. Under my site cold-climbs i am proud to say that it is number one with google.
I am new to web site design and have had no training at all it is simply self tought and not being the most arty person in the world i have finaly decided that i like the basic design of my site. I am sure there is still alot to learn but i would be gratfull of some constructive criticism or perhaps some helpfull pointers. I know that the majority of you are developers so dont laugh when you visit my site.

http://www.cold-climbs.com

Cheers people

<Mod edit to comply with Site Review Rule #1 - Masterpeace>
__________________
I just want to keep learning
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2004, 05:20 PM
GSO's Avatar
GSO GSO is offline
WebProWorld Pro
 

Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 233
GSO RepRank 0
Default Review of Cold Climbs

Hi coldclimber,
You have lots of quality content on your first page which is excellent for search engines ranking. You are using a grayscale background which is diffulcult to read over sometimes. I would use larger thumbnails and include them in your links to sections. I would suggest that you experiment with using percentages for table widths instead of absolute values. At 1024 I had no problem but your width="911" table made for alot of horizonal scrolling on 800 screen resolution. Overall your site is very informative and useful with a good solid foundation to build on. A good webmaster is always constructing their site(s).
__________________
GSO
http://www.GlobalSpecialOperations.com/
-------------------------------------
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2004, 05:31 PM
WebProWorld New Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Uk
Posts: 9
coldclimber RepRank 0
Default Review thanks

Hi thanks for that review i know what you mean about the percentage but as i say i am pretty new at this and self teaching your self dreamweaver can be a bit tricky. I have tried % sizes but the site just whent mad.I am creating the template with fireworks and it always sets it absolute unless i am missing something! still i shall keep trying to get it right.
Thanks again
__________________
I just want to keep learning
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2004, 05:41 PM
eightfifteen's Avatar
WebProWorld Veteran
 

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 489
eightfifteen RepRank 0
Default

One of the to no-no's is making people scroll horizontally. I usually make the live content area under 800px. Most people have their screen resolution set to either 800 x 600 or 1024 x 628. If you set your page to be no wider tham say 760px, it will look fine on either resolution.

By the way, LOOKS GOOD!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2004, 06:30 PM
WebProWorld Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 31
RonBurk RepRank 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by coldclimber
proud to say that it is number one with google.
Theory: there is no Google-indexed website in the world that contains any original content that is not "number one with google" -- for some search query. OTOH, your site appeared nowhere (what I like to call being "# infinity with Google" :-) in the Google serps for the possibly relevant terms "ice climbers" and "ice climbs", so some portions of that "hype about PR" may yet prove of interest to you in the future if increasing relevant search engine traffic is one of your goals.

But on with the review:

Load Speed

wget says: 16 seconds (DSL connection) to download 293,392 bytes in 48 files. This is the slowest-loading home page I've looked at in a while. If you want anyone using a non-broadband connection to use this site, consider abandoning the idea of using little jpegs everywhere. Ironically, the slow-speed people are probably hitting the Back button before all those little jpegs arrive, while the high-speed people are more likely to be using a high enough screen resolution that the little boogers are nearly illegible anyway (try viewing at 1600x1200).

If you simply cannot give up the platoon of little jpegs, you might want to consider consulting an IIS expert to fix up your configuration so that client browsers can cache those images for some reasonable period of time. Right now, clients can cache the images upon first arrival, but every time they return to the home page, they must issue dozens of request to ask your server whether any of the images have changed (even if they were locally cached mere seconds ago). In geek-speek, your server is not tranmitting an HTTP Expires: header for any of your images. That will not improve the horrible download speed of anyone's initial visit, but will at least slightly speed up subsequent views of the home page by the same visitor.

Bugs

I'm guessing that "Google Adds" was intended to be "Google Ads", assuming you want to refer to advertising rather than the ability to add something to Google.

"feelings that immerge" should be "feelings that emerge".

When you mean to say "it is", the correct contraction is "it's", not "its".

Various missing/inconsistent punctuation, capitalization and spacing problems. Could generally benefit from a thorough pass by a copyeditor.

Strange centered text that seems to be a half-aborted ad for Panasonic cameras. The text is so far from the actual link as to be confusing.

There is non-standard JavaScript cruft after your closing </html> that contains what wget mistook for a img reference to a non-existent URL. Personally, I try not to assume that search engine robots are smarter than wget. This may have been generated without your knowledge by your WYSIWYG HTML editor. Caveat emptor.

Your HTML contains no DOCTYPE declaration to tell clients which of the many versions of HTML you might be claiming to feed them. This lowers the odds that you can actually get the page to display roughly the same on more than one browser (or even widely different versions of the same browser!). It also means you can't use automated tools to detect errors in your HTML coding.

The value of such automated tools is that they could immediately inform you of such errors as (and these are actual examples from your home page HTML) wildly illegal uses of the <head> and <body> tags. Such errors matter because: they may mean your page displays horribly for people not using the exact same browser configuration as you, and they may mean that search engine robots can't understand your page well enough to index all of its text correctly.

However, if DreamWeaver has generated this illegal state of affairs for you, then you're sort of at the mercy of that tool and whatever support its vendor/users can offer you for getting it to generate legal HTML. Sadly, getting legal and safe HTML ought to be one of the benefits of using a high-level tool instead of hand-coding your own HTML. Doesn't always work out that way, though.
__________________
Relaxed Keyword Tracking
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2004, 07:33 PM
WebProWorld New Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Uk
Posts: 9
coldclimber RepRank 0
Default in reply to RonBurk

Thanks for the review well in expected somthing like that so what are you saying all in all the site is pish? mmm... well from your comments i need to do some work on the code and the load speed, well i think that without spending a couple of thousand $/£ to get some one to go over it it will have to do for now, and i will have to carry on learning.
thanks for the review though
__________________
I just want to keep learning
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2004, 07:43 PM
WebProWorld Member
 

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: http://bythevineyard.com
Posts: 78
bythevineyard RepRank 0
Default The problem....

The tiny images on your home page actually accupy more space than the larger images. You should be able to get those below 1K each. Right now they are 13-15 K each and that adds up quick when you have a dozen on there...

Look at the clothing image size on home page (1.5K) while the smaller sized category images are 10 times that size.

With the exception of the slow load time, I like your site. Great job.

Dave
http://bythevineyard.com
__________________
Review my shop?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2004, 11:57 PM
WebProWorld New Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: los angeles
Posts: 21
whothought RepRank 0
Default

Hi
Got to say i like the logo.
might think of getting shirts made.

only thing i saw that needs a fix is on this page

http://www.cold-climbs.com/catalog/

you are missing a graphic it is not on the server
file:///C|/CFusionMX/wwwroot/coldclimbs/cold-climbs.com/catalog/includes/languages/english/images/middle_image.jpg

whothought
__________________
A Working Class Hero Is Something To Be.

Employment-inc.com
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-26-2004, 11:40 AM
WebProWorld New Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Uk
Posts: 9
coldclimber RepRank 0
Default updated site

Ok I have updated my site with a few of the suggestions i recieved.
I have changed then images to smaller gifs, I have changed the size of the pages and template from 911 to 726 to remove the horizontal scroll and added links to the images.
I hope that users will now find this a better site to look at than before
__________________
I just want to keep learning
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 06-27-2004, 08:09 AM
GSO's Avatar
GSO GSO is offline
WebProWorld Pro
 

Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 233
GSO RepRank 0
Default Re-Review of Cold-Climbs

Hello coldclimber,
You site is really looking good. As far as optimizing your photos, you can do this easily without cost at http://www.netmechanic.com/ Look for their gifworks (handles jpg also) in the upper left hand corner. you can enter your URL and get your report back. while you wait, with a listing of all your images on the page and their size and you can look at a list of the image at different qualitys and the percentage that you save and download one that you like. This procedure will reduce your downloading time. You are specific topic targeted, so your audience will be more patient than the general public. Much success with your site and future climbs.
__________________
GSO
http://www.GlobalSpecialOperations.com/
-------------------------------------
Reply With Quote
Reply

  WebProWorld > Site Design > Submit Your Site For Review
Tags: ,



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0