If you have read my previous posts. In all actuality I have not spent very much time on my site at all. I spent about 4 hours building the complete site. Maybe that is why I feel it is not up to par.

Here is my logo for review let me know if you would make any changes.



http://www.gacybertech.com/

In your subject line of your post I read it to say GA CyberTech. Even tho you have differentiated it with a diff colour, it still reads as GACYBERTECH (looks funny without the font effect doesn't it). Personally I would segregate the 2 better & have it as the GA CyberTech. Maybe do something with the GA a bit more distinguishable?

Otherwise, good colours, bold without clashing, good catch phrase.




Cindy

__________________
Web Development Community ::: Forum ::: Library

It' time for Progressive Web & IT Development!

I am seeing it yet another way. Gaybertech. For some reason the arrangement hides the 'C' on me. I like the design, but I would prefer to see a visual with this logo. It would be difficult for your visitors to remember a text shape and color alone. If brand recognition is important to you, this is a must.

Take Care,
Grease

__________________
http://www.flamedesign.ca


Logo,Web,Print,Advertising

This may be subject to some argument, but I believe that gramatically your catch phrase needs the single preposition "into" rather than combination preposition "in to." As Webster says, into means "to the inside or interior of, as in: 'went into the house;' so as to be in or be included in." It seems to be that that's your meaning.

__________________
Stew P.
Tika Web Development Group
http://www.inetworld.net/dennisw/images/sill_trans.gif

Correct about 'into'; it is very important to see proper grammar in the logo.

And (conjunctive tsk tsk), I also saw it as GAYbertech as well but, as I tried to sort it out, I got bothered by the whole name. I still think it is okay but to me I can't stop wondering what 'GA' is for, I don't see it anywhere on the site.
So, how about CYBERtechGA? Has more of a ring to it, ne c'est pas?