|
|
||||||
|
||||||
| Index Link To US Private Messages Archive FAQ RSS | ||||||
| Search Engine Optimization Forum SEO is much easier with help from peers and experts! The WebProWorld SEO forum is for the discussion and exploration of various search engine optimization topics. Any non (engine) specific SEO or SEM topics should go here. |
Share Thread: & Tags
|
||||
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Is anybody aware of any preference the Search Engines may hold between Transitional and Strict HTML?
I assume Strict would be better because it forces styles to a stylesheet, thus increasing the pure textual content of an html page - is this correct? Chars. |
|
|||
|
I think that it doesn't make any difference to SEs. Provided your code is error-free, you have the same chances to get high position using either Transitional or Strict HTML.
__________________
http://www.twojecentrum.pl - Polish e-shopping center http://dzwonki-loga.pl - Ringtones for mobile phones |
|
|||
|
Thanks for the reply adore,
Has anybody else got any ideas/input on this? I had thought that since strict-HTML forces attributes out of tags and into stylesheets would mean producing cleaner, content-rich code that would then be preferred by the Search Engines. The reason I ask is I am currently re-working my companies website, so I now have the opportunity to clean up my predecessors code (I think the guy missed the lesson on adding comments!). Is strict more broadly supported than transitional? i.e. across Opera, Netscape ... C. |
|
||||
|
This topic is being covered at WPW here Good clean Html...
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
WebProWorld |
Advertise |
Contact Us |
About |
Forum Rules |
MVP's |
Archive |
Newsletter Archive |
Top |
WebProNews
WebProWorld is an iEntry, Inc. ® site - © 2009 All Rights Reserved Privacy Policy and Legal iEntry, Inc. 2549 Richmond Rd. Lexington KY, 40509 |