|
|
||||||
|
||||||
| Index Link To US Private Messages Archive FAQ RSS | ||||||
| Search Engine Optimization Forum SEO is much easier with help from peers and experts! The WebProWorld SEO forum is for the discussion and exploration of various search engine optimization topics. Any non (engine) specific SEO or SEM topics should go here. |
Share Thread: & Tags
|
||||
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I've been advised by the developer of my sitemap generator to not only institute a 301 Redirect from index.php to the root of my site, but to remove all references to index.php in my blog.
The thought is to remove all redundant references, thus maximizing SEO and making things simpler for Google. Is this second step advisable, or is the Redirect sufficient? Thanks. |
|
||||
|
I would go with the suggestion, and change your links to point to the domain root. There are a few reasons. First, you lose the processing overhead of having to process the redirect, and you slightly cut down on bandwidth as a result (browsers only make one request, not two).
Additionally, it may take longer for pagerank to be calculated through a redirect than a direct link. The current theory is that a 301 redirect does not lose page rank, however since the spider has to crawl both the URL containing the link and the page doing the redirection, it may take some time for the two pages to "merge". Finally, Google has stressed several times that they like consistency. This has been posted both in the Google webmaster forums, the webmaster blog and on Matt Cutts' own blog when he talks about canonicalization issues. For whatever reason, they recommend that you make every effort to link to the target page, not the redirection page.
__________________
The best way to learn anything, is to question everything. Interestingly Average Security Blog |
|
|||
|
Thanks for your helpful reply, wige. But perhaps I should backpedal here and ask if I the redirect is even all that helpful for Google, and, considering all the unanticipated extra work it creates, whether I should just leave my site alone.
Without the redirect, I have one set of links, and my only problem is redundant home page links between mysite.com and mysite.com/index.php. With the redirect, I have to not just remove all index.php references in the database of my blog, but locate and remove many more in the blog structure files. I'm not sure if this is advisable. Any further thoughts regarding the value of the redirect? Thanks. |
|
||||
|
If you don't have the redirect, Google will see two URLs, one at http://yoursite.com/ and another at http://yoursite.com/index.php, both with the same content. This is called canonicalization, where a canonical URL causes the same page to be displayed for multiple URLs. This will result in one variation of the page getting filtered out. When that happens, you lose the benefit of all the links pointing to that page.
By using the redirect, you merge the pagerank of the two different URLs into a single page that all spiders and visitors see.
__________________
The best way to learn anything, is to question everything. Interestingly Average Security Blog |
|
|||
|
Quote:
What you need to do is try and find out where the "index.php" is being referenced in your blog system/template and modify if to point to the "/" only (removing the index.php from the path). |
|
||||
|
This depends on how the server is configured. If the server is set up to already redirect from / to /index.php, then no you would not want to create the redirect and make an endless loop. However, most servers display the same content for both URLs, with no redirect. In that case, a redirect to one or the other is the recommended strategy.
__________________
The best way to learn anything, is to question everything. Interestingly Average Security Blog |
|
|||
|
Thanks, all. Through testing with the redirect, I've found the "/" character, where necessary, removes any problems. Haven't encountered the "endless loop" situation.
You've explained the issue pretty well, so it's up to me, I suppose, to decide whether to edit my blog structure to remove references to index.php, and create all new links to reflect the change. |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is this bad for SEO? header (redirect) on index page? | webdesignhq | Search Engine Optimization Forum | 5 | 08-28-2007 04:58 PM |
| 301 redirect - index.asp to domain root | tamecrow | Search Engine Optimization Forum | 3 | 08-16-2007 08:34 PM |
| 301 redirect for home/index page | Milo | Other Engines/Directories | 12 | 05-08-2007 10:13 PM |
| 302 redirect from link directory has hijacked my index page | sillykelly | Yahoo! Discussion Forum | 0 | 01-06-2005 09:21 AM |
| Google Index Blatently Spammed by Redirect Websites | Jacko2004 | Google Discussion Forum | 5 | 06-08-2004 10:37 AM |
|
WebProWorld |
Advertise |
Contact Us |
About |
Forum Rules |
MVP's |
Archive |
Newsletter Archive |
Top |
WebProNews
WebProWorld is an iEntry, Inc. ® site - © 2009 All Rights Reserved Privacy Policy and Legal iEntry, Inc. 2549 Richmond Rd. Lexington KY, 40509 |