|
|
||||||
|
||||||
| Index Link To US Private Messages Archive FAQ RSS | ||||||
| Search Engine Optimization Forum SEO is much easier with help from peers and experts! The WebProWorld SEO forum is for the discussion and exploration of various search engine optimization topics. Any non (engine) specific SEO or SEM topics should go here. |
Share Thread: & Tags
|
||||
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Is there an advantage to the following commands:
<meta http-equiv="robots" name="robots" content="NOINDEX,FOLLOW"> vs. <meta http-equiv="robots" name="robots" content="NOINDEX,NOFOLLOW"> The plan would be to view an existing obsolete highly ranked page, and allow it's links to be followed, with the future command to no index that obsolte page. A new page could then be created and indexed to replace it. We have numerous outdated pages within google that were indexed dating back to 12/2004. In other words, you never know when or where and older page will be deleted from the search engine, so we maintaining them until the new page is indexed. Will this "noindex,follow" command prevent a page from being droped from the index? |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
WebProWorld |
Advertise |
Contact Us |
About |
Forum Rules |
MVP's |
Archive |
Newsletter Archive |
Top |
WebProNews
WebProWorld is an iEntry, Inc. ® site - © 2009 All Rights Reserved Privacy Policy and Legal iEntry, Inc. 2549 Richmond Rd. Lexington KY, 40509 |