WebProWorld Part of WebProNews.com
Page One Link To Us Edit Profile Private Messages Archives FAQ RSS Feeds  
 

Go Back   WebProWorld > Search Engines > Search Engine Optimization Forum
Subscribe to the Newsletter FREE!


Register FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Chatbox Mark Forums Read

Search Engine Optimization Forum SEO is much easier with help from peers and experts! The WebProWorld SEO forum is for the discussion and exploration of various search engine optimization topics. Any non (engine) specific SEO or SEM topics should go here.

View Poll Results: Known Fact, My Opinion, Or Just Plain False?
Fact 0 0%
Opinion 0 0%
False 1 100.00%
Voters: 1. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2005, 02:36 AM
WebProWorld Pro
 

Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: London
Posts: 124
marketershandbook.com RepRank 0
Default Known Fact, My Opinion, Or Just Plain False?

Hi guys,

I just noticed while watching the rankings of one of my sites a pattern.

The website in question, is of adult nature, so at no point will I post the link or the keywords.

The number 1 ranked website for a keyword at the time wasn't very well optimized for that keyword. It had it in a few decent places, but they didn't pull out all the stops (Perhaps they didn't need to, i.e. other sites for that keyword not amazingly well optimized).

So my line of thinking was "If I do most of the sensible SEO techniques (ALL white hat, I never even dabble in black hat) i.e. keyword in title, description, h1 tag and here and there on the page where it makes sense to include the keyword, but obviously not over the top, I should easily get to number 1 and stay there until someone experienced in SEO topples me from the spot."

I know that I didn't OVER optimize the page and certainly wasn't anywhere near the spammy side of things e.g. keyword stuffing here there and everything.

However, my site was about halfway up page 2 for the keyword.

"hmmm" I thought.

So I looked at their page, and re-optimized my page to be only slightly more focussed on that keyword, than the CURRENT number 1 site (At the time).

My site jumped the next day to number 1 :)

By the way, this was on msn ONLY. This particular page hasn't been indexed by google and yahoo etc yet (As the site is only 3 weeks old).

My point is, perhaps SE's penalize sites for focussing on a keyword more than the current top site over a certainly limit.

Maybe this is to stop an individual website from doing every bit of legit SEO and gaining a high ranking right away and making it difficult for another site to break the position.

This would make it easier for other sites to compete for the top spot as they would have to get their site at a certain optimize level and when they are over taken, they must do a little more, or do it in a different way. This would keep the results moving around and perhaps even result in higher relevancy.

Thoughts?

Be gentle, it's just a theory I thought up in about 10 mins. Haven't had too much time to think about it (As in leaving for work in 5 mins :) )

Steve
__________________
Stephen Warren
Creater and webmaster of http://www.makeagreatsite.com
And
http://www.runescape-tip.com
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2005, 10:11 AM
ADAM Web Design's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,217
ADAM Web Design RepRank 0
Default

That's 2/3 correct. SEs penalize for focusing on a certain keyword/phrase over a density limit (otherwise we'd have sites that say keyword, keyword, keyword, keyword, keyword, keyword...) at the top of every listing.

As far as penalizing you for optimizing more than the top site in the SERPs, that would mean they would keep an ongoing record of the SERPs and their behaviour for every keyword/phrase. That would be an insane level of resource, since there's absolutely no limit to what someone could (and has) put into a search engine.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-09-2005, 04:15 AM
WebProWorld Pro
 

Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: London
Posts: 124
marketershandbook.com RepRank 0
Default

would it really be that hard?

since se's can determine keyword frequencey of pages, can't they just compare one to another and reward/penalize acordingly?
__________________
Stephen Warren
Creater and webmaster of http://www.makeagreatsite.com
And
http://www.runescape-tip.com
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-09-2005, 11:52 AM
ADAM Web Design's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,217
ADAM Web Design RepRank 0
Default

The only thing they would compare in terms of two pages would be the final score. To compare a page in keyword density to the existing #1 for all permntations and combinations of keywords and phrases and have all of that stored, as suggested, would just be too much.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-09-2005, 04:52 PM
brian.mark's Avatar
Administrator
 

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Omaha
Posts: 2,717
brian.mark RepRank 2brian.mark RepRank 2
Default Think of the number of terms...

Think of how many terms they already have. Many searches are only performed once every few months, and billions are performed each month. You think they're going to keep track of how much SEO is on the top page for billions of queries? I really doubt it.

I'd say it's much more likely that you were a little over the top and came back down below that line with the changes you did.

Brian.
__________________
ToolBarn.com, an Internet Retailer Top 500 and Inc. 500 Company | Tool Parts | Pet Supplies
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-11-2005, 09:50 AM
WebProWorld Veteran
 

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Winter Park, FL
Posts: 605
KeithO RepRank 0
Default

In my experience, adult oriented sites tend to focus more on teasers images and very little actual text. With what little text there is being stuffed with keywords, that ratio can be easily disporportionate.

If you need me furthur, I'll be in a confessional. :)
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2005, 01:49 PM
WebProWorld Pro
 

Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: London
Posts: 124
marketershandbook.com RepRank 0
Default

Hi,
just to let you know, my adult oriented site isn't outright porn lol.

The only images are a header graphi and a book cover graphic. The rest is text, and quite a lot of it i might add :)

So no need to go to confessional with my site :)
__________________
Stephen Warren
Creater and webmaster of http://www.makeagreatsite.com
And
http://www.runescape-tip.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

  WebProWorld > Search Engines > Search Engine Optimization Forum
Tags: , , , ,


« - | - »

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0