Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cbp
The days of keyword rich domain names being of any great help are over.... the spammers made sure of that.
IMHO, something like one or a few keyword rich anchor text backlinks is more benefit than the keyword in the domain name..... hardy worth worrying about..
CBP
|
cbp brings up a good point, but IMO it's also just as "dead" because there are so many squatters out there.
However, I will give a good example:
Do a search in Yahoo, MSN, AltaVist (sadly most except Google) for "tax help site" "tax answers site" and you'll see a domain that I am honestly squatting on TaxHelpSite.com. My webhost gave me 10 free domain registrations as a "sorry gift" and had the domains I already wanted, so I picked up some with the sole hope and intention that some CPA firm, tax lawyer or others, would think, "That's It - I want it!"
Anyway, that hasn't happened (yet), but it does show how some engines rank not just the domain name, but the URL file structure in general.
Another proof of this, is that when you do queries in many search engines, directories, etc. you'll see the word/terms you're searching for are bold or colored, this is true for the title, description,
and the domain/file struture - it's because they're weighting it in the relevancy IMO.
That's not to take away from the points that
cbp mentioned: the fact remains that sites MUST have good content, code, links et al, but it does bring to bear that one should be cognizant of structuring their files and URI's.
You don't have to have the
best domain name, but you can compensate by how you name your files, images and other items.
IMO - when the title, content, code and file structure compliment - they collectively kick butt!