WebProWorld Part of WebProNews.com
Page One Link To Us Edit Profile Private Messages Archives FAQ RSS Feeds  
 

Go Back   WebProWorld > Search Engines > Search Engine Optimization Forum
Subscribe to the Newsletter FREE!


Register FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Chatbox Mark Forums Read

Search Engine Optimization Forum SEO is much easier with help from peers and experts! The WebProWorld SEO forum is for the discussion and exploration of various search engine optimization topics. Any non (engine) specific SEO or SEM topics should go here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-07-2005, 07:32 AM
WebProWorld New Member
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Delray Beach, FL
Posts: 22
Chief Blogster RepRank 0
Default Sandbox

I have been reading about the Sandbox theory and it is starting to appear that I am there.

Blogster.com has been live since late last year but we just "re-released" the site in Feb. I am finally starting to see us appearing in google for seconadary keywords (i.e. free blogs) but no where for blog or blogs or weblogs. We have only really been active for 2 months now and have about 60K pages indexed in Google. The PR 4 that we have on the home page is from the old site and NO sub-sites have any PR.

If you believe in Sandbox, does this appear to be a classic case?

Blog on...
__________________
Chief Blogster | PCSecurityShield
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-07-2005, 08:09 AM
cbp cbp is offline
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
 

Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,987
cbp RepRank 1
Default

Most cases of alleged sandbox are not, they just rank poorly.

To be sandboxed, you pretty much need to meet all these criteria:
Quote:
* site is on a new domain launched site since around March 2004
* targeted keyword(s) are moderate to highly competitive
* most of the sites pages are indexed by Google
* Googlebot crawls the site regularly
* ranks well for non-competitive keywords
* ranks well in Yahoo! and MSN
* ranks well in Google for an allinanchor:keyword(s) search
* has at least a reasonable PR and a good number of backlinks
* site has reasonably good optimization (eg keyword density and placement), but its not over done.
* absence of anything known to get a penalty or ban in Google
* the site does not rank in at least the top 500 or so for its main keyword
CBP
Reply With Quote
Reply

  WebProWorld > Search Engines > Search Engine Optimization Forum
Tags:



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0