|
|
||||||
|
||||||
| Index Link To US Private Messages Archive FAQ RSS | ||||||
| Search Engine Optimization Forum SEO is much easier with help from peers and experts! The WebProWorld SEO forum is for the discussion and exploration of various search engine optimization topics. Any non (engine) specific SEO or SEM topics should go here. |
Share Thread: & Tags
|
||||
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
ok just wondering if there is any difference between "/page_name.htm" and "mydomain.com/page_name.htm" in the eyes of search engines.
are they both same or one methord is better then the other? |
|
|||
|
Technically, there's not any difference. It should point to the same page in most cases. This is called the absolute path versus the relative path to a file.
For optimization purposes, it's better to specify the full url in all your links, even if it's a path to an image. There are many reasons why, including: - to prevent domain hijacking - to prevent indexing problems (if you have more than one domain pointing to content then it can get really messy really quickly) - to prevent an accidental change in PageRank being applied to the wrong page. (domain.com/index.html is different than www.domain.com/index.html). - to prevent dns hijacking of a site - to prevent pagejacking Whatever you do, be consistent. If you use relative paths then use it throughout the site. I recommend, though, that you always specify the full path of the url.
__________________
Bill Hartzer's Blog |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
WebProWorld |
Advertise |
Contact Us |
About |
Forum Rules |
MVP's |
Archive |
Newsletter Archive |
Top |
WebProNews
WebProWorld is an iEntry, Inc. ® site - © 2009 All Rights Reserved Privacy Policy and Legal iEntry, Inc. 2549 Richmond Rd. Lexington KY, 40509 |