PageOne PageOne | Forum Index | Design | Search Engines | Sales & Marketing | IT Discussion | eCommerce | Forum Center
The World's eBusiness Forum PageOne
Link To Us Log In/Out Search Edit Profile Private Messages User Groups FAQ
WebProWorld Members,


I wonder if, in the history of Google algorithm updates, has one gone live without controversy following it? Google's most recent algorithm update, codenamed: Panda has certainly been met with a heap of controversy. I think Buffalo Springfield said it best; battle lines are being drawn, and indeed, nobody's right if everybody's wrong.

Some have praised Panda, and have noticed significant upgrades in the quality of results. While others have the notions that the update simply improved results for others, while perfectly legitimate sites took a huge dive.

Google has been adamant about how this update will combat content farms, and allow more reliable sites to be put in the forefront. It has accomplished its goal to an extent, certain content farms have ranked lower on Google. However, some of the same type of sites are doing just fine.

Suite101, according to metric data, has suffered the worst in terms of percentage as it relates to organic performance. It is considered a content farm, but eHow, one of its direct competitors is still doing well in Google's search results. What could be the difference between these two sites that function much on the same level?

This discrepancy is an example of what many have been criticizing Google for in their latest update. In fairness, Google has admitted their algorithm isn't perfect and if webmasters contact them with proof their site is being pushed down unfairly, then they'll launch an investigation.

Here's a few things Google changed with the Panda update (if you want the full list, click the first link up above):

- User comfort level in the trust area

- Is it considered authoritative

- Is the content quality good enough for print?

- Are there too many ads?

- We know Google has its definition of what could be considered low quality

- Google uses a “classifier” to draw a line in the sand

Since everyone is divided over Panda, what are you opinions concerning the update? Has your site benefited from the algorithm change, or has it slumped?

The ideas presented in the WebProWorld newsletter editor's note do not reflect the thoughts, and ideas of the WebProWorld community.

| JohnnyV |

Top Post Go Directly to Forums
Monday, March 07, 2011 Visit Here

Google Discussion Forum
Can Google Or Would Google Read The Name Of My Databases?

Can Google Or Would Google Read The Name Of My Databases?
Good Monday members of WebProWorld.com and thank you for your time. I have a questions about Google and their relationship to my database. Do they have one?

I've seen a lot of strange things with Google bot over the years, or, something that's come from Google that seems to be able to read my forms and submit them - not to mention the fact that I can give Google-bot access to private member areas of my site (Google's own user-name) if I so choose to.

So with that said, could it or would it be possible or of Google's interest to at least read/find the name of my databases?

I ask because for some of the site's I'm playing with right now, I may want to use the same database but on different sites - the content displayed differently etc. but I have a suspicion Google may not like this practice too much...

Any thoughts are always appreciated!

Read Replies
Posted by: morestar View Post | Click To Comment


Site for Review http://decentwallpapers.com/

My website is new little over few day old, and i just upload 300k Wallpapers you can Download Free wallpapers, Cars wallpaper, Computers wallpapers, windows wallpapers, mobiles wallpapers, computer wallpapers, Hollywood Celebrities wallpapers, Male celebrities wallpapers, movies wllpapers...

View The Site


Hot Topics

Networking
Problems with Outlook connecting to MS Exchange when using a BT Hub

I have recently installed a BT Hub (wifi) on my home phone line, replacing my previous SKY router and before that a NETGEAR router. Whereas previously I could successfully connect from Outlook (2007) from my laptop running Windows XP Home Edition to MS Exchange, I cannot since installing my BT Hub.

I can however still successfully connect using my 3G Vodafone Mobile Connection (USB dongle) and from locations offering wifi connections e.g. East Coast Trains. All BT have been able to suggest is deactivating the BT Hub's firewall. This is no problem as I'm running a Norton firewall. However, deactivating the BT Hub's firewall doesn't solve the problem, i.e.

Outlook continues to display (until it times-out) 'Trying to connect to MS Exchange', but it never succeeds.

Read Replies

Posted by: IWhiteBoss View Post | Click To Comment

Database Discussion Forum
MySQL Joins

I have 2 tables that are almost identical structure. One field, "case_no" is present in both tables.

TABLE A
id ... case_no ... date ... content
1 ... 1451 ... 2011-01-05 ... trees are green
2 ... 1452 ... 2011-01-06 ... sky IS blue
3 ... 1453 ... 2011-01-08 ... this IS fun
4 ... 1454 ... 2011-01-15 ... so are you

TABLE B
id ... case_no ... date ... content
1 ... 1452 ... 2011-02-02 ... this IS happy stuff
2 ... 1454 ... 2011-02-03 ... yes, i agree
3 ... 1452 ... 2011-02-04 ... IS this the end?

Read Replies

Posted by: blitzen View Post | Click To Comment

Google Discussion Forum
So What Now - Google Algorithm Aftermath

What is everyone doing who got hit? One of our sites (the only one that got hit) is StarReviews which got absolutely devastated, so the question is what now? What is everyone else doing? I know I am not the only one checking SERPs 5 times a day and trying to make tweaks to the site.

Most of those who got hit have content and probably lots of it. Google just told you your content sucks. I for one disagree but am I going to upgrade 1000's of pages of content not knowing whether or not Google cares or if it will help or do I just abandon the site? Let it sit and hope that at some point in the future Google discovers the error of its ways.

The other thought for us is to take categories of content and develop targeted niche sites and expand the content. But then I am basically starting from scratch unless I do 301s redirects from the old to new for that category. For example, I take everything finance related in StarReviews, open FinanceReviewsbyStar and do a 301 redirect. Now the site is totally focused on one category. But then is the 301 redirect not only passing all the link juice and links but is it also passing my Google penalty or downgrade or bitchslap .. whatever you want to call it? I am not trying to game Google, I am trying to develop a site that is viewed as valuable and from what I have seen many niche sites are doing well.

What are the options for sites that were at one time significant, have employees and can no longer stand on their own? We buy a lot of websites but I am not sure I want to touch sites that got hit not knowing if it is going to get worse.

Read Replies

Posted by: ArthurNYC View Post | Click To Comment


:: Forum Stats:

Threads: 84,882
Posts: 510,981

Would You Stream Your Clickstream Data?

Applying

Sharing information online has evolved dramatically in recent years. Email, blogging, social networking, and tweeting have all changed the way we communicate and share. Interestingly, a new startup hopes to take sharing in a whole new direction.
The official Video blog.
The Impact of IBM's Watson on Healthcare
More Videos...

WebProNews: Videos


Trust yourself. Think for yourself. Act for yourself. Speak for yourself. Be yourself. Imitation is suicide.

Marva Collins

:: Sponsors:

Page One | Forum Index | Advertise | Archive | About | eBusiness Headlines | Comments/Feedback
-- WebProWorld is an iEntry, Inc. publication --
iEntry, Inc. 2549 Richmond Rd. Lexington KY, 40509
2011 All Rights Reserved Privacy Policy and Legal

">Unsubscribe from WebProWorld.
To unsubscribe from WebProWorld or other iEntry publication,
simply send an email request to: support@ientry.com