Diff between "new" and "newer" MSN algos
One can forsee that live.com results will quickly acquire a status as - if not more - important than search.msn.com results.
However, a few days after launch the live.com results seem to still be very raw. Also, despite the Web 2.0 social bookmarking aspects promised in live.com, I can see no obvious link between the rankings differences I observe and any tagging activity on Technorati, Digg, del.ici.ous, etc.
Anyone else looked into these differences yet and have any comments?
|