Is it profitable to display competitor ads?
Let's take a look at an aquisition that took place not long ago -- but an eternity in tech years -- the Yahoo aquisition of Flickr.
However, what still mystifies many are Google's Adsense ads still being displayed on Flickr. While some speculate that Flickr will end up being a testing ground for displaying their own ads, Yahoo Publisher Network (aka, Overture), the cold truth of the matter is that after the time that has passed since the aquisition -- Google ads are still there winking us in the face.
I don't know about you, but I have three guesses as to the hold-up of making the switch.
First, maybe they just haven't gotten around to it yet, and things move slowly internally there at the Y.
Second, maybe they're finding the Google Ads to be a better way for the aquisition to pay for itself -- which may say something about YPN...or not.
My last guess is that just maybe they're not as interested in Flickr, in itself, as a moneymaker. Rather, it could be a testing grounds to study their competitor's revenue-generating ads in a unique website environment, in order to tweak their own YPN.
My gut feeling leans towards the last one. Flickr may be the first to do what it does, as it introduced the concept of "unsupervised" tagging of certain areas of pictures (I'm not going to touch that one...), and trust me I've found it to be as fun (and humorous) as the next person. But I can't say I think that Yahoo would have purchased it for its technology or branding, as a stroll through HotScripts (for instance) will show that with up-and-coming ready-made scripts that do nearly the same thing, there could be an emerging crop of similar sites in no time. So to me, it clearly seems this would be a "strike while the iron's hot" scenario.
That is, unless having Google Adsense is already hot enough for Yahoo.
|