|
|
||||||
|
||||||
| Index Link To US Private Messages Archive FAQ RSS | ||||||
| Internet Security Discussion Forum This forum is for the discussion of security related issues. If you find a new Phishing scheme, spyware, virus or malicious site - let us know about it. If any of the above found you... here's where you ask for help. |
Share Thread: & Tags
|
||||
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Vulnerabilities are found in many software products no mater where they come from.
Which is better? There is no blanket anwser. But in the case of open source software you may legally look at the code and change it to suit your needs and fix it if you have to, that is not the case with propititary software you must rely on the copywright holder for all your changes and fixes. Vulnerabilities in open source software are more likely to found by some one wanting to fix it than by some one wanting to exploit it. In the long run my bet's on open source. Just make sure you upgrade or patch you software as soon as a fix is available. All the phpBB forums that got hacked did not.
__________________
Irony: That for most people the most "trusted" web site on the planet is for a company the has been convicted of criminal activity. Both Security and SuSe start with "S". www.oldslides.com |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Surely with paid-for Bspoke systems, you should have the security of knowing that the system is relativly safe from optimistic attacks by a worm and that the license provider is responsible for keeping you informed and providing a fix for potential security issues. |
|
||||
|
To each his/her own
It may be wise to check http://secunia.com/product/ Quote:
__________________
Irony: That for most people the most "trusted" web site on the planet is for a company the has been convicted of criminal activity. Both Security and SuSe start with "S". www.oldslides.com |
|
|||
|
mushroom I personally agree with you on this topic, just because a piece of software is Open Source doesn't automatically make it insecure (or more insecure), just as having closed source software doesn't guarantee security.
Although I don't want to play the anti Microsoft role here, they provide the most well known example in Internet Explorer. Source code not seen by anyone in the general public yet it seem's a vunerability is exposed almost every week. I think the idea that Open Source software is unsafe for business use is one being put about by larger companies, in an attempt to convince uneducated users that their product is somehow better regardless of functionality. Just my thoughts on the subject
__________________
Change is inevitable....except from vending machines |
|
||||
|
Thanks both for your thoughts, I am a big user of open source, I like it because you 'can play' with the code to customise it for your own needs plus there is usually plenty of support and ideas hidden within respective forums.
I only started to think about this subject matter after being quoted £40K for a CMS license (to say I nearly laughed in the man's face...). It just started to make me wonder, just how good is Bspoke? |
|
||||
|
Avoid Hostageware at all costs or as other people call it Lock-in-Software where files are not saved in an open standard
More: http://www.msversus.org/node/74
__________________
Irony: That for most people the most "trusted" web site on the planet is for a company the has been convicted of criminal activity. Both Security and SuSe start with "S". www.oldslides.com |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
WebProWorld |
Advertise |
Contact Us |
About |
Forum Rules |
MVP's |
Archive |
Newsletter Archive |
Top |
WebProNews
WebProWorld is an iEntry, Inc. ® site - © 2009 All Rights Reserved Privacy Policy and Legal iEntry, Inc. 2549 Richmond Rd. Lexington KY, 40509 |