Quote:
"Site Finder was not controversial with users, 84 percent of whom said they liked it as a helpful navigation service," said Tom Galvin, VeriSign's vice president of government relations. "We continue to look at ways we can offer the service while addressing the concerns that were raised by a segment of the technical community."
Galvin said that the continued opposition stems from "an ideological belief by a narrow section of the technological community who don't believe you should innovate the core infrastructure of the Internet."
|
"innovate the core infrastructure" - sounds like someone is using the bullsh** generator.
The DNS system is anything but innovative. It is a simple distributed-database system (no bullsh** generator, I got that out of a book) that allows an user to quickly resolve a hostname to an ip address - and that is all it is meant to be.
Even if I bought the quote above, how is adding a wildcard for *.com and *.net "innovating the core infrastructure of the Internet"?
In
VeriSign's Response to IAB on Site Finder Service, they address some issues which the IAB has brought forward. They don't, however, provide any real justification for why this "service" needs to be implemented other than the BS they splash around in the conclusion to the whole thing:
Quote:
Conclusion
VeriSign is fully committed to a secure, stable and interoperable Internet that will continue to innovate and grow in a responsible manner. It is important to recognize that striving to make the user experience the best it can be without sacrificing stability and security is an objective that benefits us all.
|
I understand their "benefit". Traffic directed to them where they can sell services and ads.
What is the user's benefit? In IE I have an option to search from the address bar and I have it turned off because it annoys the hell out of me.