|
|
||||||
|
||||||
| Index Link To US Private Messages Archive FAQ RSS | ||||||
| Insider Reports Anyone is welcome to reply and discuss but starting new topics is reserved for WebProWorld staff and MVPs. |
Share Thread: & Tags
|
||||
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Thanks, |
|
||||
|
Hi Maximilian,
Yes that is one. There a lot of examples were Google banned people for buying links. It was a case were Google saw one site selling liks and banned all the sites that site was linking to. I guess they know they look so bad there just trying to make webpronews look bad also. |
|
|||
|
But does WPW link to these? AFAIK, back-links can't get a site banned, the links have to be outbound-links to these dodgy sites to get banned..... am I wrong?
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
They banned all the sites that traffic power was working with also. I could be wrong but the way I understand it, Traffic Power used door way pages. The pages belonged to traffic power. But were directed towards clients sites. Again I could be wrong about what they were doing but this was my understanding. They could use those same pages for your site and get you banned without you doing anything. If that is there forum there not above doing it. |
|
||||
|
Ken, they are all "bogus" forums with no real substance. They have used member names from several forums. cbp has already reported that someone is apparently on seo-forum.net posing as him.
I don't think it's wise to be including links back to these sites either. Paul |
|
||||
|
cbp, We all know that just by the context of the post.
Paul, it's a done deal, I edited all posts. Is it better to reveal these recovery tactics for what they are, or let them reveal themselves through their own obvious falsehoods? There also seems to be a string of affiliated seo sites coming on such as 1p.com. Ken |
|
||||
|
Janeth,
There is not much chance of building a great deal of traffic to negative spoofy bash forums is there? Have we ever broached the subjects of intentional Internet defamation of character. or Internet Libel here? You would think they were looking at enough lawsuits already. Ken |
|
||||
|
From “answers.google.com:
"Wikipedia has an article about defamation of character, slander, and libel at [ http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libel ]. A relevant quotation from this is: "Libel and slander are two forms of defamation (or defamation of character), which is the tort of making a false statement that would tend to unjustly lower its hearers' or readers' opinion(s) of the person(s) the communication was about. When the communication is in writing, it is properly termed 'libel'. If made via the spoken word, the correct term is 'slander'." The point here, is that libel is a subcategory of "tort." What's a tort? From [ http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tort ]: "Under United States law, torts are generally divided into two categories: intentional torts and non-intentional torts. Intentional torts include those actions that are intentional and voluntary and that are made with knowledge by the tortfeasor (i.e. the person who committed the tort) upon the plaintiff (the one who brings the complaint seeking relief). Intentional torts include: battery, assault (apprehension of harmful or offensive contact), false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, the real property tort of trespass to land, and the personal property torts of conversion and trespass to chattels. Amongst unintentional torts one finds negligence as being the most common source of ligitation in most American courts. It is a form of extracontractual liability that is based upon a duty of care of a reasonable person, who, being the proximate cause of damages, and but for the tortfeasor's act, is the cause of damages to the plaintiff. Other non-intentional torts include negligent infliction of emotional harm."" _____ From www.firstamendmentcenter.org: "A lawsuit over an alleged libel that happened to occur online would proceed like any other libel action (see Libel & defamation topic in Press section) if the accused were known and named. But when the alleged libeler is anonymous, the offended individuals, corporations or other entities may try to smoke out their critics — and, they hope, suppress their criticism — by filing what have been called cyber-SLAPPs. “SLAPP,” coined by the University of Denver’s Political Litigation Project, stands for “strategic lawsuit against public participation.” (See SLAPP topic in Petition section." _____ Is there cause for a libel case? Is there combined power and resources by targeted companies to bring cause? Is another class action pending yet? _____ They seem determined to commit suicide, don't they? Disclaimer - This message body only contains libel references by other sites and subjective commentary and should not be mis-interpreted as legal advice. Ken |
|
|||
|
Greetings to you all.
I can't talk directly about some of what you fine folks are experiencing, but i can tell you a bit more about the new tactics that TP is using. After a site that i originally designed was optimized by them (against my better judgement), it was banned as a result of the door way pages. They wouldn't respond to email or phone calls. A few weeks later (shortly after the backlash on this forum and others) new emails and phone calls began. "That person doesn't work here anymore.....We don't do that.......We changed our name......" The new sales pitch is: Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 1:09 PM > Subject: Important info from Traffic- Power. com > > > Dear Traffic Power Client, > > Due to the rapid growth of our company, Traffic-Power. com, we have recently undergone a few corporate changes. As your new account representative, I'd like to make you aware of these improvements. Traffic Power has branched out to specialize in ALL forms of internet advertising, and because of this, we are now doing business under the name of 1st Internet Advertising. If you should receive an email from 1stinternetadvertising.com, please do not disregard it, as it may contain very important information regarding your Traffic Power campaign. > > Our Search Engine Optimization website can now be found at 1p. com, although our Traffic- Power. com site will remain updated for our current clients. > > You have probably already been notified of our new technology updates which are taking place currently. This new technology will allow us to not only improve your current placements, but keep your website completely anonymous for privacy and security purposes. All of our updates are 100% Search Engine compliant. > > If you have not already received your new Promotional Site information via email, please be on the lookout for it. This will give you the name of your promo site, as well as your new username and password. This promotional site will host our new coding and technology, and direct all traffic to your original URL. > > If you have any questions, please give me a call or send me an email. I look forward to working with you. Cc: help@ internetadvertising1. com ; jlambert@ traffic-power. com > Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2004 6:51 PM > Subject: Promotional Site Completed for - www. wisconsin- vacation. net > > > Hello from the First Place support department. > > > > Congratulations! Your pages have been uploaded with the newest First Place code. > > > > Your Promotional Site URL is: www. wisconsin-vacation. net > > > > *Results - It takes approximately 8-14 weeks for most search engines to add your new information to their databases although the spiders may see your promotional site many times during that length of time. For this reason, it will take approximately 8-14 WEEKS from your completion date for your promotion to produce good results. > > > > If you have any questions please contact the support department at help@ internetadvertising1. com or 866-896-2896 ext. #192. > > > > > > Please save a copy of this email for your records. Done against our will, after the original contracts were expired! Nothing was asked for, it was just done! Now we have to try and get them to take our REAL content off of the pages and get them to break links to our site! It is OUR obligation to get the links not leading to the web site. This company is a perfect example of Cyber-Extortion! La Cosa Nostra (sic?) It is beginning to feel as if viruses and trojans are a rather benign threat. If it weren't for thousands of $ in print adds and the few back links that are already out there. Our original Url would already be gone! I am working on a new SEO strategy, but there is a rather convoluted mess to clean up here and the cyber extortionists are definetly making it as hard as possible! I feel for what you folks are going through, Good Luck! P.S. I tried to break up all urls with spaces so it doesn't affect this RESPONSIBLE website. |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
WebProWorld |
Advertise |
Contact Us |
About |
Forum Rules |
MVP's |
Archive |
Newsletter Archive |
Top |
WebProNews
WebProWorld is an iEntry, Inc. ® site - © 2009 All Rights Reserved Privacy Policy and Legal iEntry, Inc. 2549 Richmond Rd. Lexington KY, 40509 |