Search relevance, trust and meaningless SERP's

[kgun]

Seems that I get not response to this http://www.webproworld.com/breakroom...tml#post393818 thread, so I follow it up with a broader discussion that I hope will be commented and answered.

I don't have to repeat this, but here are two related threads:

"TrustRank" vs. "PageRank"

Semantic engines - nothing difficult, at all...

[kgun]

Today I made an interesting observation. Tried the following 2 KW searches on Google and Clusty.

1. advanced semantic linking

Google:

#1: Advanced semantic linking and transclusion.

#7: http://friendfeed.com/e/4a84bf02-1cc...-transclusion/

Clusty: #4 for Google #1 above.

2. semantic linking

Google:

Not found on the first 10 SERP's.

<digression>
Last hit on page 10: Why kill Google? | The Semantic Web | ZDNet.com GoogleBOT does not have feelings
</digression>

Clusty:

#5

Advanced semantic linking and transclusion. - WebProWorld - FriendFeed

Related links:

Semantic Web in the news | Decentralized Information Group (DIG) Breadcrumbs

http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?i...69&type=series

http://www.w3.org/Talks/2001/12-semw...slide13-0.html

Seems that this is not a topic for WPW members.

Brought this LSI/LSA – Is MSN Ahead of GOOGLE in AI? thread to the top and got a negative rep point (I think I know from whom) with the following comment.

"Topping ancient threads for no reason?"

Hint: May be that should be asked before adding a negative reputation

You should know. If I silently leave this forum to work more on my sites and extranet, WPW is still my favorite eBusiness web forum.

1. Still no reaction to this important topic?
2. Any comment to the two searches / results mentioned above?

Note: I did not look through the Google SERP's more than once, so I may have missed the link on semantic linking.

Is Google compatible with itself http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/d...ite=google.com

"What happened when Google visited this site?

Of the 1640 pages we tested on the site over the past 90 days, 0 page(s) resulted in malicious software being downloaded and installed without user consent. The last time Google visited this site was on 09/21/2008, and suspicious content was never found on this site within the past 90 days.Malicious software includes 2 trojan(s). Successful infection resulted in an average of 0 new processes on the target machine.

Has this site acted as an intermediary resulting in further distribution of malware?
Over the past 90 days, google.com/ appeared to function as an intermediary for the infection of 3 site(s) including"

............................ Sites deleted.

What about my own meta SE?

http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/d...urftoolbar.com

Google so start visiting my site.