|
|
||||||
|
||||||
| Index Link To US Private Messages Archive FAQ RSS | ||||||
| Google Discussion Forum Google Discussion forum is for topics specifically related to Google. There is a subforum dedicated to AdSense/AdWords subjects. |
Share Thread: & Tags
|
||||
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I have recently purchased traffic from ROI Performance Media. I set up a subdomain that is a duplicate of my domain to be able to track all the traffic from entry to goal conversion.
The numbers that ROI is giving me for traffic are several (5) times higher than what google anaytics is showing me. ROI says that Google is not perfect and that their numbers are right. They are offering to send me some other "free" tracking software that does a better job than google analytics. Has anyone seen problems of accuracy with google anaytics, or did I just get cheated again? Thanks, Charles |
|
|||
|
The main reason Google is lower is because Google doesn't include visits from known SearchBots/Crawlers in it's general traffic reports. This is huge when it comes to sales forecasting.
Statcounter software would have to know the IP addresses of every Spider, pinger, and crawler currently surfing the web. I assume there's 1000's. So in many statcounter software packages, a number of Website Crawlers are overlooked and not filtered from the general traffic reports. To verify this, check the recorded IP's of some of your visitors. Copy and paste the hostname or url into google/yahoo/msn and do a search. You will find many of your visitors are Telecommunications providers, domain registries, and WebsiteCrawlers. ---------------------------------------------------- Jacksonville website design - Websites and web systems Last edited by imsickofwebpro; 11-30-2007 at 08:21 PM. |
|
||||
|
I'm with Charles. I've just switched to GA and I notice a huge drop in visits. I'm devastated to think what was 1500 visits is really only 226. That seems crazy. I also have SmarterStats thru my host. I think I would have rather remained clueless.
__________________
Nicci Custom Native American Jewelry | Custom Native American Handmade Jewelry Blog |
|
||||
|
Stat packages are really relative. As most suggest javascript based packages miss spider traffic and could be filtering our some visitors. I would suggest running a localized log analyzer that can run against you raw logs and then use one online that is robust and free as GA.
|
|
||||
|
THanks for the info. I thought StatCounter was also a javascript counter.
__________________
Nicci Custom Native American Jewelry | Custom Native American Handmade Jewelry Blog |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| accuracy of Google Urchin Traffic Stats vs 1&1 | killerbeame | Google Discussion Forum | 5 | 01-23-2007 11:53 PM |
| $€£ BetOnMarkets.com System - 95% accuracy. Limited! Proof! | DanielB88 | Ad Space Buy and Sell | 0 | 12-21-2005 12:36 AM |
| Traffic Checker Accuracy? | motionex | Marketing Strategies Discussion Forum | 0 | 11-08-2005 10:49 AM |
| Accuracy of Google Toolbar | tbone542 | Search Engine Optimization Forum | 5 | 09-01-2004 10:03 PM |
| Campaign Tracking: ASP Analytics or Log File Analytics? | mlillig | Google AdWords/Google AdSense | 0 | 08-20-2004 03:45 PM |
|
WebProWorld |
Advertise |
Contact Us |
About |
Forum Rules |
MVP's |
Archive |
Newsletter Archive |
Top |
WebProNews
WebProWorld is an iEntry, Inc. ® site - © 2009 All Rights Reserved Privacy Policy and Legal iEntry, Inc. 2549 Richmond Rd. Lexington KY, 40509 |