Google recently beefed up our webmaster quality guidelines

[dann]

Matt Cutts recently posted in his blog this beefed up guidelines crap.
I think the wording may have changed but it seems like just the same old cryptic dribble.
Still raggin on WebPosition Gold™. Why when there are a plethora of other programs that do the same thing. Not that I use WPG, just curious.
I hate commenting in that blog, after a few hours it really gets psychotic with a post like this.
Have a look at this babble and tell me if it makes sense to you.
BTW is there an official handbook for "upholding the spirit of the basic principles"??????
Thank G it's Friday!
Webmaster Help Center - Webmaster Guidelines
Dan

[crankydave]

LOL Dan

I don't know that I really see much of anything "new". A few more examples perhaps.

Dave

[incrediblehelp]

I am done listening to Matt Cutts (Google). They never give direct answers. Everything is explained in a round-a-bout way. A good example of this is the recent reciprocal linking fiasco. Graywolf has a good comment in the thread:

SEOmoz | What it Looks Like to Be Hit By Google's Real Estate Reciprocal Link Penalty

[SemAdvance]

Originally Posted by incrediblehelp

I am done listening to Matt Cutts (Google). They never give direct answers. Everything is explained in a round-a-bout way. A good example of this is the recent reciprocal linking fiasco. Graywolf has a good comment in the thread:

SEOmoz | What it Looks Like to Be Hit By Google's Real Estate Reciprocal Link Penalty

Oddly enough I stopped listening to MC Google Puppet the day he first blogged.

Cannot imagine Google would not be forthcoming in how to expoit thier search algorithm......

Then again many people are waiting for the KFC recipe too.

Google, KFC, Google, KFC, Google, KFC,

Which one will release the secrets first???

Who cares?

;->