I am down with the ODP...
For a while now, DMOZ.org has appeared to be understaffed....and I am wondering how relevant their model will continue to be.
Thousands and thoustands of new sites with pages and pages of content go up just about every day. Can a comparative handful of part-time volunteer editors handle the enormity of the task of viewing each submitted page, evaluating the content, and write descriptive liners?
The bugaboo is that DMOZ continues to count in terms of page rank. And it enhances visibility at the search engines. So the Open Directory Project's historical relevance as a human-edited, volunteer undertaking for-the-people, by-the-people is in need of a serious upgrade.
(Caveat: I used to be a DMOZ editor and loved the experience. But it requires a lot of unpaid work. When paying work comes pouring in, guess what activities tend to go to the wayside?)
And although I still have several sites listed at DMOZ....I get nary a visitor from them. But the description at Google is priceless.
Is Google going to cling to DMOZ....or is DMOZ going the way of the dinosaur....or will DMOZ revamp its model and become more relevant?
I would love to know.
|