|
|
||||||
|
||||||
| Index Link To US Private Messages Archive FAQ RSS | ||||||
| Google Discussion Forum Google Discussion forum is for topics specifically related to Google. There is a subforum dedicated to AdSense/AdWords subjects. |
Share Thread: & Tags
|
||||
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Quote:
This is clearly not the case.. Is Don't use "&id=" really just &id= and not ?id= or ?something= I think Google would be doing just half a job if it negglects ?id= ... Half the web is madeup of dynamic pages! Why would they quote the above? |
|
|||
|
id? or shop_id? whats the difference
A dynamic site has to use this in the URL. If google choses not to index anything? or id? the results of a great deal of the web will be ignored including this forum! The whole thing seems very bizzar |
|
|||
|
It makes no sense at all for Google to index 10000 identical pages simply because you feel that you have to use the ID= in your URL, which you do not have to do.
You can use it or not, but if Google chooses not to index or rank the pages then you have been advised against it. |
|
|||
|
Was expecting a more comments on this one!
There is still a great deal to question re this one. I am presuming that "&id=" meens exactily that and not "?id=" If Google has a problem with "id" this seems also very strange. Or is it any use of the "&" as in http://www.webproworld.com/posting.php?mode=reply&t=62302 "?mode=" is not different to using "?id=" nor is "&t=" any different to "&id=" Only Google in its infinite wisdom knows I guess..... |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
WebProWorld |
Advertise |
Contact Us |
About |
Forum Rules |
MVP's |
Archive |
Newsletter Archive |
Top |
WebProNews
WebProWorld is an iEntry, Inc. ® site - © 2009 All Rights Reserved Privacy Policy and Legal iEntry, Inc. 2549 Richmond Rd. Lexington KY, 40509 |