Contact Us Forum Rules Search Archive
WebProWorld Part of WebProNews.com
Page One Link To Us Edit Profile Private Messages Archives FAQ RSS Feeds  
 

Go Back   WebProWorld > Search Engines > Google Discussion Forum
Subscribe to the Newsletter FREE!


Register FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Chatbox Mark Forums Read

Google Discussion Forum Google Discussion forum is for topics specifically related to Google. There is a subforum dedicated to AdSense/AdWords subjects.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-20-2005, 11:05 AM
jacobwissler's Avatar
WebProWorld Veteran
 

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, Texas USA
Posts: 557
jacobwissler RepRank 0
Default Google Directory Updated

The Google Directory has been updated. My site fell a little, but the number of back links increased. Not logical.
__________________
Sincerely, Jacob
SEO Houston
Everything looks better in Safari
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-20-2005, 11:25 AM
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,715
greeneagle RepRank 0
Default

I almost hate to speculate on this, this early Jacob, but it almost seems to me that GOOGLE has "transferred" some of the "Relevancy Factor" from IBLs to OBLs, both in Quantity and Quality in this update.

My opinion is that they have been looking for relevant "exocentric" Sites for the last 2 updates. They did "squash" a number of "self catering" Directories, while elevating the prominence of others in the last update, didn't they.

Ken
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-20-2005, 11:41 AM
jacobwissler's Avatar
WebProWorld Veteran
 

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, Texas USA
Posts: 557
jacobwissler RepRank 0
Default Do not know

Ken, if you can figure out what Google is up to, you are a smarter man than me.
__________________
Sincerely, Jacob
SEO Houston
Everything looks better in Safari
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-20-2005, 11:50 AM
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,715
greeneagle RepRank 0
Default

Jacob,

It also seems like GOOGLE has reinforced, or applied a "long term" link aging factor that may even evaluate the number of times selected, spiced with how long the visitors stay, sharpening their IBL "Relevancy" Tool.

That should have been expected though.

With GOOGLE, IBL's have been being gained and lost simultaneously, for a while. IMO - They continue to "tweak" that alg aspect with "Jagger". IMO - They applied their "patent" a little deeper here, thus the large % losses in IBL's for many.

Ken
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-20-2005, 11:53 AM
jacobwissler's Avatar
WebProWorld Veteran
 

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, Texas USA
Posts: 557
jacobwissler RepRank 0
Default Link Age

Most of my links are more than a year old.
__________________
Sincerely, Jacob
SEO Houston
Everything looks better in Safari
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-20-2005, 12:04 PM
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,715
greeneagle RepRank 0
Default

Jacob,

Do you have a good feel for how often they are selected and how long visitors stay, from your stats?

Granted most stats don't convey how long a visitor stays on an individuallly identifiable page, like GOOGLE may or may not be able to deduce and record... but is overall time increasing in the longer period denominations as expressed in your stats?

Ken
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-20-2005, 12:14 PM
jacobwissler's Avatar
WebProWorld Veteran
 

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, Texas USA
Posts: 557
jacobwissler RepRank 0
Default Time

People stay on my site a long time; I have 1,400 words of text per page.
__________________
Sincerely, Jacob
SEO Houston
Everything looks better in Safari
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-20-2005, 12:46 PM
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,715
greeneagle RepRank 0
Default

Generally, "Spam Marketing" creates:

fewer selections of OBLs on any Site using any technology, even including CSS Spam. They really don't give a rat's a__ about what technology is being used, this way! - They "get it" and filter it out through this "Relevancy Factor" being applied to IBLs and OBLs now...

Lower visitor viewing durations

Why not toss those over to the OBLs too? These alg changes aren't so sudden most of the time any more. They come in stages... I haven't seen anything this time that wasn't at least hinted at in the last update.

IMO - Every reasonable guess and logical thought points that direction.

Ken
Reply With Quote
Reply

  WebProWorld > Search Engines > Google Discussion Forum
Tags: , ,



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0