WebProWorld Part of WebProNews.com
Page One Link To Us Edit Profile Private Messages Archives FAQ RSS Feeds  
 

Go Back   WebProWorld > Search Engines > Google Discussion Forum
Subscribe to the Newsletter FREE!


Register FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Chatbox Mark Forums Read

Google Discussion Forum Google Discussion forum is for topics specifically related to Google. There is a subforum dedicated to AdSense/AdWords subjects.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2005, 10:45 AM
roban roban is offline
WebProWorld Pro
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 138
roban RepRank 0
Default Cube Cart Shopping Cart

A statement was made in the CC forums:

"At the present time, CC in the URL code, has the following -- &catid -- according to Googles new rules, it has to be changed to this: &catid.

As the urls are now, none of the Url's will be indexed in google. This renders CC useless in google for getting any traffic ......"

Is this accurate?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2005, 02:56 PM
brian.mark's Avatar
brian.mark brian.mark is offline
Administrator
 

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Omaha
Posts: 2,717
brian.mark RepRank 2brian.mark RepRank 2
Default Precise, but not accurate...

That's precise if you want to have valid code, but the accuracy is off. Google hasn't ever required valid code and hasn't changed recently. Sure, it'd be nice if everyone were to code everything properly, but I've seen plenty of sites that don't do it right that are listed just fine in the SERPs.

This page: http://wildleg.com/?c=25&st=p&d=DESC is indexed, and I never got around to changing that & to valid code. It's even ranked at various times for keywords on the page, which wasn't ever planned. It was a nice bonus, though.

On the Google Sitemap program, that's a little different - you want to do that correctly. But their bots aren't as picky as their Sitemap program. Just think of how many pages they'd exclude if they required that links be valid - and with Yahoo already showing an index well over double what Google claims, they don't want to exclude that many pages.

Brian.
__________________
ToolBarn.com, an Internet Retailer Top 500 and Inc. 500 Company | Tool Parts | Pet Supplies
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-17-2007, 09:30 AM
danners's Avatar
danners danners is offline
WebProWorld Member
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 28
danners RepRank 0
Default Re: Cube Cart Shopping Cart

there is an SEO modification you can add to Cubecart which makes the URL SEO friendly (plus allows custom meta and title tags)
see Colours of the Soul - Colour Therapy Training, Healing, Products and Consultancy for example

"As the urls are now, none of the Url's will be indexed in google. This renders CC useless in google for getting any traffic ......"
rubbish - even if the URL does not validate this makes little if any difference to Google.
__________________
Creative web design company with top-notch website designers in the UK.

Last edited by danners : 10-17-2007 at 09:32 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  WebProWorld > Search Engines > Google Discussion Forum
Tags: cart, cube, shopping



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0