WebProWorld Part of WebProNews.com
Page One Link To Us Edit Profile Private Messages Archives FAQ RSS Feeds  
 

Go Back   WebProWorld > Search Engines > Google Discussion Forum
Subscribe to the Newsletter FREE!


Register FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Chatbox Mark Forums Read

Google Discussion Forum Google Discussion forum is for topics specifically related to Google. There is a subforum dedicated to AdSense/AdWords subjects.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2005, 10:16 AM
WebProWorld Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 64
mess RepRank 0
Default How to be indexed fast by Google?

I just arrived here and I want to start a discussions about google.

How can I be indexed fast and often by google bot?

Any suggestions, techniques, trics are welcome.
I would like to know how many weeks, months it take to google to crowl 15.000 pages from http://www.uk-loan-finance.com ?


I think that is usefull for everybody.

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2005, 10:58 AM
WebProWorld Veteran
 

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Winter Park, FL
Posts: 605
KeithO RepRank 0
Default

you already added your link to your sig. just give it time and they will visit. the spider comes here often. as far as frequency, you need to build links to your site and have dynamic content.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2005, 11:41 AM
SEOforGoogle's Avatar
WebProWorld Veteran
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 436
SEOforGoogle RepRank 0
Default

You need to spiderbait your site.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2005, 11:42 AM
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld Moderator
 

Join Date: May 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,330
jestep RepRank 0
Default

Quote:
I would like to know how many weeks, months it take to google to crawl 15.000 pages from http://www.uk-loan-finance.com ?
Google will never crawl this many pages on a new site. Your site will have to be around for a while and you will need to get a lot of links into it for google to crawl this many pages. I would say that if you actively promote it, it will take several months for your entire site to be indexed and spidered. Google has been cracking down on large sites, and will not index all of the pages unless they are very unique and have good content on them.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2005, 12:38 PM
brian.mark's Avatar
Administrator
 

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Omaha
Posts: 2,717
brian.mark RepRank 2brian.mark RepRank 2
Default You could always try...

You could always try the Google Sitemap program. I've tried it on a couple of new sites and had some success. It's worked VERY well on established sites.

Brian.
__________________
ToolBarn.com, an Internet Retailer Top 500 and Inc. 500 Company | Tool Parts | Pet Supplies
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2005, 02:01 PM
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,715
greeneagle RepRank 0
Default

Quote
Quote:
"I would like to know how many weeks, months it take to google to crawl 15.000 pages from http://www.uk-loan-finance.com?"
How do you justify the need for 15,000 pages for a loan/mortgage company?

You'll probably trip the spam filters many refer to as the "sandbox" dumping that "load" into the system, if you haven't already.

The Loan and Mortgage Industry is one of the heaviest spammers on the Net almost equal to Viagra, Cialas, Pharmaceuticals and "Surprise your woman in bed".

IMO 15,000 pages for that kind of site have to draw "the flies all green and buzzing".

You may blow a main breaker there! No one can guess at where that is going.

Ken
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2005, 04:18 PM
WebProWorld Veteran
 

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Winter Park, FL
Posts: 605
KeithO RepRank 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by greeneagle
Quote
Quote:
"I would like to know how many weeks, months it take to google to crawl 15.000 pages from http://www.uk-loan-finance.com?"
How do you justify the need for 15,000 pages for a loan/mortgage company?

You'll probably trip the spam filters many refer to as the "sandbox" dumping that "load" into the system, if you haven't already.

The Loan and Mortgage Industry is one of the heaviest spammers on the Net almost equal to Viagra, Cialas, Pharmaceuticals and "Surprise your woman in bed".

IMO 15,000 pages for that kind of site have to draw "the flies all green and buzzing".

You may blow a main breaker there! No one can guess at where that is going.

Ken
That is a very valid point. Even going to the website myself, I don't know from first glance if it is a resource site or a link farm.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2005, 05:16 PM
WebProWorld Pro
 

Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 218
sem-seo-pro RepRank 0
Default 15,000pages

Hi there

If all 15,000 pages are put up on the server at once and having read Googles latest patent filing it will appear as an obvious spam tactic and will never make it out of page 100 for results.

As for how long it would take simply read your website stats, see how many hits are credited to googlebot, usually its between 400 and 2000. Divide hit counts by 15 (avg hit count per page) and you'll come up with the number of pages it is spidering on it's visit.

However if you have broken links or an all javascript navigation menu you probably won't see pages indexed soon, if at all.

Clint
__________________
Search Engine Marketing
Search Engine Optimization Blog
"The only thing not possible, is whatever you tell yourself is impossible"....
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2005, 05:17 PM
WebProWorld Pro
 

Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 218
sem-seo-pro RepRank 0
Default PartTwo

One other thought.

As a new site it is also a good idea to consider a pay per click campaign while waiting results from the search engines.

Clint
__________________
Search Engine Marketing
Search Engine Optimization Blog
"The only thing not possible, is whatever you tell yourself is impossible"....
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2005, 05:32 PM
WebProWorld New Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9
don quichote RepRank 0
Default

Hi,

If you want to be craweled faster or at least better.You could use Google's sitemap.They have a generator wich produces a .xml file.

Googlebot really likes it..
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2005, 05:42 PM
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,715
greeneagle RepRank 0
Default

Hello and welcome aboard "don quichote". I should expect your advice will show us how to walk through those "cracks" between this existence and the next! Looking forward to it!

Ken
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2005, 09:55 PM
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
 

Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 2,193
cyanide RepRank 0
Default

considering I'm getting a domain.com cannot be found error, I'd say you'll be waiting a loooooonnnggg time.

even without the error...
(uk-loan-finance + 15,000 pages) = something fishy
- you'll get crawled, but don't expect any dramatic results
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2005, 01:22 AM
WebProWorld Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 64
mess RepRank 0
Default

Many thanks for all your posts.

But I have seen some sites lounched 2 months ago, and whe i try:

site:www.domain.co.uk -qwerrew I'm surprised to see:

Results 1 - 10 of about 144,000 .

So if somebody tell us how can be indexed so fast and so many pages 144.000 in 2 months he is the one.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2005, 08:58 AM
brian.mark's Avatar
Administrator
 

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Omaha
Posts: 2,717
brian.mark RepRank 2brian.mark RepRank 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mess
Many thanks for all your posts.

But I have seen some sites lounched 2 months ago, and whe i try:

site:www.domain.co.uk -qwerrew I'm surprised to see:

Results 1 - 10 of about 144,000 .

So if somebody tell us how can be indexed so fast and so many pages 144.000 in 2 months he is the one.
Indexed and ranking are quite different. Just get zillions of links, submit a Google Sitemap XML feed, and then watch yourself be sandboxed for a year or more if you really just want to be indexed and don't care if someone can find you. The advice given above was supposed to help you realize what you need to do for rankings as well as indexing, not one without the other.

Brian.
__________________
ToolBarn.com, an Internet Retailer Top 500 and Inc. 500 Company | Tool Parts | Pet Supplies
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2005, 07:13 PM
WebProWorld Member
 

Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 36
theswami RepRank 0
Default

brian-mark - are you saying that it's the zillion links or the XML or both that's going to hurt the site? We've just implemented the XML sitemap into our site, which has been 'sandboxed' for about 11 months; not so much in hopes of breaking out, but more to help out Google with navigating the site.

What we've seen is that Google seems to have dropped many of our pages - almost ignoring the usual site crawl and opting ONLY for the XML sitemap.

I would love to know if anyone else has had any experiences as of yet with the Google sitemap good or bad.

Thanks
__________________
Free Sports Picks
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2005, 08:12 PM
WebProWorld New Member
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 12
JonOSteen RepRank 0
Default

I would worry more about building content, not building pages.
__________________
Search Engine Design.com
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2005, 10:30 PM
brian.mark's Avatar
Administrator
 

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Omaha
Posts: 2,717
brian.mark RepRank 2brian.mark RepRank 2
Default When you submit...

Quote:
Originally Posted by theswami
brian-mark - are you saying that it's the zillion links or the XML or both that's going to hurt the site? We've just implemented the XML sitemap into our site, which has been 'sandboxed' for about 11 months; not so much in hopes of breaking out, but more to help out Google with navigating the site.

What we've seen is that Google seems to have dropped many of our pages - almost ignoring the usual site crawl and opting ONLY for the XML sitemap.

I would love to know if anyone else has had any experiences as of yet with the Google sitemap good or bad.

Thanks
When you submit a sitefeed, it is normal for the standard crawls to stop for a couple days. That's happened to every one of the few dozen I've submitted that to. After a couple of days, the sites got hit hard by Googlebot.

I wasn't saying either was going to hurt the site. What I was saying is that just because those other sites you see are indexed doesn't mean they rank. That is a HUGE difference. I could build 10,000,000 pages that don't rank, or build 10 clear, concise pages with good content that all rank in the top 10. I'd rather have the 10 personally.

With Google, the more links you have from related sites to yours the faster (under normal conditions, not for banned sites) the site gets spidered.

Brian.
__________________
ToolBarn.com, an Internet Retailer Top 500 and Inc. 500 Company | Tool Parts | Pet Supplies
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2005, 01:05 PM
WebProWorld Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 64
mess RepRank 0
Default

Thanks all,

I realise that i have to implement sitemap to be faster indexed by google.
I'll start a new topic about that.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2005, 04:35 PM
WebProWorld Pro
 

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: California, The OC
Posts: 283
voasi RepRank 0
Default

If you want to be indexed and crawled daily, get a few incoming links and setup an indexable RSS feed. Your good to go.
__________________
Voasi Blog
SEM Inc. Blog
Reply With Quote
Reply

  WebProWorld > Search Engines > Google Discussion Forum
Tags: , ,



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0