Contact Us Forum Rules Search Archive
WebProWorld Part of WebProNews.com
Page One Link To Us Edit Profile Private Messages Archives FAQ RSS Feeds  
 

Go Back   WebProWorld > Search Engines > Google Discussion Forum
Subscribe to the Newsletter FREE!


Register FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Chatbox Mark Forums Read

Google Discussion Forum Google Discussion forum is for topics specifically related to Google. There is a subforum dedicated to AdSense/AdWords subjects.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2004, 01:29 PM
katiab's Avatar
WebProWorld Member
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: florida
Posts: 69
katiab RepRank 0
Default Mirror Sites a Bad Move for SE?

I market intl-roots.com and internationalrootscompany.com, mirror sites.
I paid a company to get me top ranking, all it did is delete me from all SE. I need to rank for "Vintage Posters" and "Collectible Photography" mainly. The tags they generated on my home page are not proper English but they insist I need to keep them the way they are to rank on Google. I don't!
They also told me that the mirror sites might be the reason why I no longer rank well. Is this true?
If so, what can I do? The SE have pages on both URLs.
HELP!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2004, 01:41 PM
sfowler's Avatar
WebProWorld Veteran
 

Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 957
sfowler RepRank 0
Default

You are going to have to lose one set of content. One easy way is with a server side 301 redirect. If both addresses have been in use for some time you are going to have to contact all your partners who link to one address and get them to swap to the other address. That page description has to go. The keywords will also need some severe pruning.
__________________
Simon - Biogas, Rauchgasanalysator and Rauchgasanalysegerät
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2004, 05:03 PM
incrediblehelp's Avatar
Moderator
WebProWorld Moderator
 

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Live in Cincy Now
Posts: 7,732
incrediblehelp RepRank 4incrediblehelp RepRank 4incrediblehelp RepRank 4incrediblehelp RepRank 4
Default

fowler,

It looks as if these two domains are pointing in the DNS to one IP. You cannot do a 301 redirection unless both websites are actually being hosted.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2004, 05:54 PM
sfowler's Avatar
WebProWorld Veteran
 

Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 957
sfowler RepRank 0
Default

I didn't cut them out and try them. If it is just a parked dmain, then there should not be a problem with that. They re not mirror sites, just one site. The description and keywords will have to change though.
__________________
Simon - Biogas, Rauchgasanalysator and Rauchgasanalysegerät
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2004, 06:39 PM
incrediblehelp's Avatar
Moderator
WebProWorld Moderator
 

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Live in Cincy Now
Posts: 7,732
incrediblehelp RepRank 4incrediblehelp RepRank 4incrediblehelp RepRank 4incrediblehelp RepRank 4
Default

sfowler, I don't agree. I have seen parked domains cause many issues lately within Google. For some reason Google seems to index multiple parked domains for the same web site. Sometimes Google picks and choose which domain to use with the natural search results when both domains have inbound links to it. This can cause GREAT problems with duplication within the index. How is Google to decide which domain to use within its listings? Sometimes it is uses both. I have not seen this problem with parked domains that have never had a real website exist within it (hence no inbound links). It is only when you try park domains that have had previous rankings and popularity with the Google index.

An example of this is when a client acquires another company and its website. What they point the DNS to the new IP or main domain. This can cause the issues above.

I have brought this problem to the attention of this forum MANY times in he past with no real answers or solutions coming from any members.

My only solution is that I have found to correct the problem mentioned above is to set up hosting for both domains and do a proper 301 redirection so Google can finally realize the secondary domain name is going away for ever.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2004, 04:04 AM
sfowler's Avatar
WebProWorld Veteran
 

Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 957
sfowler RepRank 0
Default

You may be right. I will probably find out soon, since we just parked www.sensonic.co.at and started www.sensonic.at. I will keep a closer eye open for this sort of problem. Thanks for the warning.
__________________
Simon - Biogas, Rauchgasanalysator and Rauchgasanalysegerät
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-21-2005, 01:21 PM
katiab's Avatar
WebProWorld Member
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: florida
Posts: 69
katiab RepRank 0
Default parked domain issue

All I know is that my ranking has suffered severely from it. I also paid a marketing company $1,000 to get these keywords and description. Once, I changed them because I really don't like them but they made me put them back for results. I guess I should just do my own thing because their help (not cheap) has put me under! Thanks for your help. I'll try and fix the keywords and see if it helps.
Have a nice day,
katia
http://www.intl-roots.com

- I'm taking internationalrootscomapny off the air as soon as possible!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-21-2005, 01:27 PM
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
 

Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas, Texas USA
Posts: 1,509
bhartzer RepRank 1
Default

katiab, you should go back to that firm and ask for your money back. They did not do the right thing--they should have told you that putting up duplicate content (mirror sites) will get you severely penalized in the search engines if not banned completely.

What you need to do is to pick one domain name and put up a 301 Permanent Redirect from all your other domain names to that one domain name.

The search engines don't want people littering up their databases with useless duplicate content. They want to index one set of your content, not two or more.
__________________
Bill Hartzer's Blog
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-21-2005, 11:08 PM
cspelts's Avatar
WebProWorld Veteran
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fallbrook, California
Posts: 545
cspelts RepRank 0
Default

Katiab, you should feel very free to redo the meta tags - as they are now, they aren’t helping you much. There’s a lot of repetition - the word ‘art’ appears in the title twice, in the description four times, and in the keywords six times!

But the thing that really stands out to me is the phrase ‘poster art’ is used nine times, but ‘art posters’ in not used at all. When you choose keywords think about different ways a potential client might go looking for you. You can’t worry about every variation, but you should try to hit the most obvious.

The good news is that at least they used different meta tags on each page! With a little tweaking you should be in good shape!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-22-2005, 04:57 AM
freehits's Avatar
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Posse's On Broadway
Posts: 1,027
freehits RepRank 0
Default

<h2><font size=2 face="Verdana,Arial,Helvetica">Newsletter:

<input name="ea" type=text value="Enter Email Address" size=25>
<input type=hidden name="m" value="1011096931213">
<input type=hidden name="p" value="oi">
<input type=submit name="go" value="Go">
</font></h2>


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >

This is not the <h2> Tag I normally target. I think the headings need a major overhaul.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-22-2005, 09:03 PM
katiab's Avatar
WebProWorld Member
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: florida
Posts: 69
katiab RepRank 0
Default Keyword Changes

You have helped me make a final decision to change the meta tags and links on the site.
I never liked the limitations with text, and the tags were not even proper English. I finally set myself free and changed the tags to content more suited to what I see. -- AND asked for a full refund from the marketing company which i believe they agreed on. Thanks for the support.
Let me know if there is anything unpleasant in my new approach...
And I tried to understand the comment on <h2> tags, and as I understand it, there shouldn't be <fonts> and the like in between. If I am mistaken, kindly clarify your explanation, otherwise, it's on my to do list!
Thnaks a million for the guidance.

- OH, I ALSO AM GETTING RID OF INTERNATIONALROOTSCOMPANY.COM.
It's long, newer and probably the best choice to get read of.

Katia
ORIGINAL VINTAGE POSTER GALLERY 1880, 1980
http://www.intl-roots.com
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-22-2005, 09:14 PM
katiab's Avatar
WebProWorld Member
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: florida
Posts: 69
katiab RepRank 0
Default Search Engine Marketing

I used to be very high on Search Engines but seem to have lost that priviledge.
I am not sure what needs to be done to get me good placement. Any tips would help.
Take care
Katia
ORIGINAL VINTAGE POSTER GALLERY 1880 TO 1980
http://www.intl-roots.com
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2005, 06:04 AM
WebProWorld New Member
 

Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 14
GnnC RepRank 0
Default domain mapping VS 301 redirect

what's the difference and which is better?
Reply With Quote
Reply

  WebProWorld > Search Engines > Google Discussion Forum
Tags: , , ,



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0