|
|
||||||
|
||||||
| Index Link To US Private Messages Archive FAQ RSS | ||||||
| Google AdWords/Google AdSense Discuss topics specific to Google's AdWords and AdSense programs. |
Share Thread: & Tags
|
||||
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Hi folks, maybe you can help me to understand Google better. But already, I'm starting to Hate Google.
Check out this report I pulled for one of my campaigns: http://www.fineartphotogifts.com/report.htm Notice the two keywords that are "at risk." I don't understand why it's at risk. The CTR is 1.27% and 1.33%. The avg positioning is 1 and 1.1. What does Google WANT??? How much better must these keywords do in terms of CTR or how much I'm paying (did you notice that?) in order to be NOT at risk? I have another campaign doing the same thing. What am I missing here? People are clicking through...and very well at that. So what the #$%^*& does Google want??? |
|
|||
|
Just my opinion. I think your keyword list is very short, you should made a longer list and write at least two separate ads in the same campaing with two different keyword groups. Then checked its relevancy. When you have a longer list of keywords you increase your chances of biding a lot less so your campaing is more profitable. Did you make any sales?
Myriam Google Cash System |
|
|||
|
Its based on your last 1000 impressions. Overall your CTR could be high but if its low on your most recent 1000 impressions is low they will gwt you.
I had something running there. First 800 impressions 3 sales, last 1500, disabled. Frustrating.
__________________
http://freeonlinenodownloadgames.blogspot.com/ |
|
||||
|
Gee, that doesn't seem entirely fair. As you pointed out, I could be doing great for 6 weeks, and then in the first 3 days of the 7th week the ad gets axed because the last 1000 impressions didn't produce enough clicks?
If that's true, then that's utterly insane and stupid. What would be better is if they did a running average, kind of like the basic stock-price indicators. Though it's not ideal, I see much more flexibility and usability in that scheme than Google's current scheme. |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
WebProWorld |
Advertise |
Contact Us |
About |
Forum Rules |
MVP's |
Archive |
Newsletter Archive |
Top |
WebProNews
WebProWorld is an iEntry, Inc. ® site - © 2009 All Rights Reserved Privacy Policy and Legal iEntry, Inc. 2549 Richmond Rd. Lexington KY, 40509 |