Contact Us Forum Rules Search Archive
WebProWorld Part of WebProNews.com
Page One Link To Us Edit Profile Private Messages Archives FAQ RSS Feeds  
 

Go Back   WebProWorld > eCommerce > eCommerce Discussion Forum
Subscribe to the Newsletter FREE!


Register FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Chatbox Mark Forums Read

eCommerce Discussion Forum Ask questions about web hosting, merchant services and ecommerce issues. Topics include shopping carts, security, payment strategies, storefront partnerships, etc.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-16-2005, 03:59 PM
jmiller's Avatar
WebProWorld Veteran
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 658
jmiller RepRank 0
Default XXX Domain Proposal Has Limp Reception

The “virtual red light district,” as the proposed .xxx domain for adult content has been dubbed, hit a snag just one month before final approval. A sudden influx of opposing voices has caused the US government to reexamine the ups and downs of the issue.

Michael D. Gallagher, assistant secretary for communications and information at the Commerce Department asked the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) to delay approval of the new domain after “unprecedented” opposition. Gallagher said the move was to “ensure the best interests of the Internet community as a whole are fully considered.”

"The volume of correspondence opposed to creation of a .xxx TLD (domain name) is unprecedented," Gallagher said, referring to nearly 6,000 letters received by the Commerce Department on the matter.

The bulk of concern centers around a domain set aside for pornography, a realm that some family activists would prefer to be non-existent. Other conservative voices contend that the creation of the “virtual red light district” would legitimize pornographers.

The domain was proposed five years ago by Florida-based ICM Registry, Inc., but has not received much attention until ICANN preliminarily approved it two months ago. Official approval for the suffix creation was scheduled as early as today.
ICM chairman Stuart Lawley is confused about the timing of the objections.

"This matter has been before ICANN for five years, and very actively and publicly debated for the past 18 months," he said. "We are, to say the very least, disappointed that concerns that should have been raised and addressed weeks and months ago are being raised in the final days."

Others that have opposed the domain creation have argued that porn sites set up sites on in the new .xxx domain while maintaining their original .com sites for double the traffic and reducing the effectiveness of software designed to block .xxx names.
__________________
"I never met a Kentuckian who wasn't coming home."--Governor Happy Chandler
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-17-2005, 05:35 PM
WebProWorld Veteran
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Castle Rock, CO
Posts: 494
Corey Bryant RepRank 0
Default

And now it seems that Bush is against it as well. If they would only think about it for a few minutes, it would help block porn on a lot of computers by just blocking the XXX domain name.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  WebProWorld > eCommerce > eCommerce Discussion Forum
Tags: , , , ,



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0