WebProWorld Part of WebProNews.com
Page One Link To Us Edit Profile Private Messages Archives FAQ RSS Feeds  
 

Go Back   WebProWorld > WebPro Exchange > Content Buy/Sell > Content Discussion Forum
Subscribe to the Newsletter FREE!


Register FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Chatbox Mark Forums Read

Content Discussion Forum This is a forum where people can discuss questions about content creation, management and practices.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-30-2006, 01:18 PM
jmiller's Avatar
WebProWorld Veteran
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 658
jmiller RepRank 0
Default A Plea: Don't Overthrow King Content

This article inadvertently turned into a Net Neutrality article, as the implications became clear to me. It began with a reaction to a Bear Sterns presentation, focusing less on content and more on aggregation and context, whereby a cable-like Internet would be created.

But I feel if that becomes the focus for the 21st Century, then we'll end up with an Internet much like the world of cable, where content is selected and presented and controlled, leaving us with fewer choices than more of them.

My dense article here.
__________________
"I never met a Kentuckian who wasn't coming home."--Governor Happy Chandler
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-02-2006, 02:32 PM
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
 

Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,059
Dcrux RepRank 1
Default

You're kidding ...right? Content died a long time ago. It's almost impossible to get on-topic posts in the content discussion forum.

And these are not executives we're talking about. About every third post here asks about "the best CMS" with not so much as a hint of content strategy. It could be called information, or quality writing. It's not. For every 200 discussions of which CMS there is perhaps one about actually creating quality content.

Check out this nice article arguing about scraped content. This is hardly atypical. Content is what fillss a layout container. And the time spent on the layout versus writing anything substantive is evidence.

In The rebooter’s children go rebootless Zeldman notes

Quote:
Maybe redesigning for the sake of redesigning is not enough: to communicate visually one must first have something to communicate about. ...Rarely could you identify an idea or purpose behind the site, or name a possible user goal the site was intended to facilitate. There was no flow, no legibility, no usability. It wasn’t so much that the designers had contempt for their users as that they seemed never to have been taught to think about users at all.
Is this very far from the most mindlessly superficial best of network TV? Have you ever landed on a site SEo'd within an inch of its life? Ever find a site with stock photography cliches?

People build layouts and fill them. They fill the conteainer with generic, trite, boring content. The very term content suggests no less. Content was designed to be an excuse for technology. For more sites than would care to admit it, content is what's keeping the keywords from running together.

Content would be that kingdom the vast majority are too embarrassed to admit they can't find on a map. In practice, content is merely a figurehead king, without power or authority. Not much different than make believe "reality TV."
Reply With Quote
Reply

  WebProWorld > WebPro Exchange > Content Buy/Sell > Content Discussion Forum
Tags: , , ,



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0