Dave, many of the things you say are unquestionable to me too. It is not (and has not been) my intention to detour your thoughts nor to defend anybody.
I just felt you were being unnecessarily agressive to Garrett and in public. Because, eventhough your point of view about what the reports should be and whether Garrett is accomplishing the objective or not can be shared by many of us...it is no more than a point of view. It is not *the truth*.
I can be even 100% in accord with you about the things you say...but I will never admit violent manners in front of my eyes.
If you had good thoughts for Garrett (it can be anybody, this is not personal) you would have sent a PM or an email giving to him your opinion and maybe an advise.
Saying that in the public thread in that way leads me to think that you mean not to say something constructive, but to embarrass a person.
I can be wrong about this, and my apologises if I am, but I want to let you know my way of thinking. I will say no more in this thread, though I will come back to hear you if you want to reply.
Good afternoon there, Dave :o)
Kiss,
Gi
ps. what does IMO mean? Sorry for asking but I am a spanish speaker.
|