Quote:
Originally Posted by MrGamm
I'm not sure what your asking... I think there is nothing wrong with your site. It has content of interest to others. It's targeted towards an audience in a unique way I think. The website structure looks fine... The graphics are slick and professional. It's accessible. It's all around good.
When I used to worry about supplemental ratios... I used this... site:seoworkers.com -inallurl:seoworkers.com - Google Search
I could never get exact supplemental ratio listings. However... the number of real pages indexed using the normal site: prefix is 42... which co-incidentally is the same number returned in the estimate of the inallurl prefix search. Not sure if it means anything exactly... but it's notable I think...
In any event it's always been a bit of a mystery...
Edit... my mistake... it's 32 not 42... still a mystery... I just don't know... who does? |
Thanks James for the feedback. I just completed a two year work on my project "alternative to the nofollow attribute".
If you look at internal and external links, like the "Unsubscribe Newsletter" or "Subscribe to our feed" or the link of the banner "MT" or at my forms which I do not want to be crawled/followed, of the social media bookmarking links on my articles (hint: 301 redirects and not 302, redirecting the bots to the homepage) I am sure you will be impressed.
Your comments will be as always very appreciated.
P.S. Result: I think I found the problem with the site: operator. When I get my confirmation I will keep you updated.