Thread: To follow or to "nofollow"?
View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-28-2008, 04:19 AM
Webnauts's Avatar
Webnauts Webnauts is offline
WebProWorld 1,000+ Club
WebProWorld MVP
  
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 8,170
Webnauts RepRank 9Webnauts RepRank 9Webnauts RepRank 9Webnauts RepRank 9Webnauts RepRank 9Webnauts RepRank 9Webnauts RepRank 9Webnauts RepRank 9Webnauts RepRank 9Webnauts RepRank 9
Exclamation Re: To follow or to "nofollow"?
Quote:
Originally Posted by kgun View Post
Isn't that already discussed here?

Internal and external links and the rel="nofollow" attribute


An that is thorougly discussed in this Does PR Sculpting Work? thread where Webnauts has made some inåut.

Last updater here: PR Sculpting - What is optimal?
Kjel my original was:

Quote:
I would like to start a discussion about how the major search engines Google, Yahoo and MSN currently treat the rel=”nofollow” attribute.
I am not talking about PageRank Sculpting. I wan't a clear definition how every major SE perceive it and deal with it.

If that info is somewhere in the threads you posted, please be so kind and add the links to those posts here . When that is done, we can ask the mods to close the thread.

Thanks buddy.
__________________
"Being an expert isn't telling other people what you know. It's understanding what questions to ask, and flexibly applying your knowledge to the specific situation at hand. Being an expert means providing sensible, highly contextual direction." Jeff Atwood
SEO Workers - Search Engine Optimization Consulting Company | SEO Analysis Tool | Webnauts Net SEO
Reply With Quote