Yes, rules are Ok, but it is also assumed that the rules are equally valid to everybody.
- I doubt that the majority of webmasters have heard about the rel="nofollow" attribute.
- There is no discrimination on geo location and language. How many in Norway have heard about the above attribute? I doubt there are many. I have asked two webmasters. None of them had heard of it.
- I nofollow links exchanged with friends. Bots are not human beings. The SE Bot could reckognize a pattern that were mistaken as a paid link pattern.
- Static brand links that are nofollowed. Google should love that model, but my above article is still not indexed.
No hit:
Pay per static brand link a better solution for professional publishers site:adschoolworld.com
But there is a paid Google AdWords link at the top of the SERP.
Buy Relevant Edu Links
On Quality Sites & Watch Your Website Traffic Sky Rocket
Site: http://www.edutextlink.com/
Google:
"Pay per static brand link a better solution for professional publishers"
One of the two links I mentioned in my above post are now removed.
And in my opinion web standards are set here:
http://www.w3.org/
Quote:
Originally Posted by wige
Kgun, in your install of IE 6, do you have Google Toolbar installed?
Google toolbar now overrides the default error document if it is below a certain size. This is also done by Google Chrome.
|
Source:
Custom error pages::: Best practices.
Overriding a 404 error document below a certain size. What standard is that?